Literature DB >> 8051237

Comparison of four commercially available rapid enzyme immunoassays with cytotoxin assay for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin(s) from stool specimens.

C S Merz1, C Kramer, M Forman, L Gluck, K Mills, K Senft, I Steiman, N Wallace, P Charache.   

Abstract

Rapid (2.5- to 3.5-h) enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxins have been developed. We report the results of simultaneous testing of 700 fresh stool specimens by the tissue culture cytotoxin assay and four EIAs (Bartels Prima System C. difficile Toxin A EIA, Cambridge Biotech Cytoclone A+B EIA, Meridian Diagnostics Premier C. difficile Toxin A EIA, and TechLab C. difficile Tox-A Test EIA). In cases of disagreement, culturing for toxigenic C. difficile was performed. A total of 61 (8.7%) specimens from 46 patients were positive for C. difficile toxin. The sensitivity of the cytotoxin assay was 87%, and that of culture was 93%. In comparison with the cytotoxin assay results, the sensitivity and specificity of the EIAs were as follows: Bartels, 87 and 96%; Cambridge, 89 and 99%; Meridian, 87 and 98%; and TechLab, 87 and 95%, respectively. In comparison with the cytotoxin assay plus toxigenic culture results, the sensitivity and specificity of the EIAs were as follows: Bartels, 84 and 97%; Cambridge, 85 and 99%; Meridian, 79 and 98%; and TechLab, 80 and 96%, respectively. The EIAs varied in positive predictive values (PPVs). A high PPV was seen with the Cambridge EIA (96%); lower PPVs were seen with the TechLab (64%), Bartels (72%), and Meridian (80%) EIAs because of high false-positive rates. The negative predictive values (98 to 99%) were excellent with all EIAs. Results were indeterminant with 0.3% of the samples by the Meridian EIA and 3% by all the other EIAs. Although the EIAs were less sensitive than the cytotoxin assay, they provide same-day results and may be useful in laboratories without tissue culture facilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8051237      PMCID: PMC263625          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.32.5.1142-1147.1994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  17 in total

1.  Evaluation of a commercial enzyme immunoassay kit for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxin A.

Authors:  S P Borriello; T Vale; J S Brazier; S Hyde; E Chippeck
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Purification of a functional receptor for Clostridium difficile toxin A from intestinal brush border membranes of infant hamsters.

Authors:  R D Rolfe; W Song
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Biological activities of toxins A and B of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  D M Lyerly; D E Lockwood; S H Richardson; T D Wilkins
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  Comparison of the VIDAS Clostridium difficile toxin A immunoassay with C. difficile culture and cytotoxin and latex tests.

Authors:  C J Shanholtzer; K E Willard; J J Holter; M M Olson; D N Gerding; L R Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Diagnosis and monitoring of Clostridium difficile infections with the polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  S J Kuhl; Y J Tang; L Navarro; P H Gumerlock; J Silva
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Comparison of three enzyme immunoassays, a cytotoxicity assay, and toxigenic culture for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.

Authors:  F Barbut; C Kajzer; N Planas; J C Petit
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Clostridium difficile: clinical disease and diagnosis.

Authors:  F C Knoop; M Owens; I C Crocker
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Comparison of two toxins produced by Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  N S Taylor; G M Thorne; J G Bartlett
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  Influence of age, sex, and diet on asymptomatic colonization of infants with Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  M Cooperstock; L Riegle; C W Woodruff; A Onderdonk
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated gastrointestinal disease: comparison of a monoclonal antibody enzyme immunoassay for toxins A and B with a monoclonal antibody enzyme immunoassay for toxin A only and two cytotoxicity assays.

Authors:  G V Doern; R T Coughlin; L Wu
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  22 in total

1.  Rapid and sensitive loop-mediated isothermal amplification test for Clostridium difficile detection challenges cytotoxin B cell test and culture as gold standard.

Authors:  Torbjörn Norén; Ingegärd Alriksson; Josefin Andersson; Thomas Akerlund; Magnus Unemo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile: comparison of the cell culture neutralization, Xpert C. difficile, Xpert C. difficile/Epi, and Illumigene C. difficile assays.

Authors:  P Pancholi; C Kelly; M Raczkowski; J M Balada-Llasat
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Frequency of sample submission for optimal utilization of the cell culture cytotoxicity assay for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin.

Authors:  Anita P Borek; Deborah Z Aird; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea and colitis: usefulness of Premier Cytoclone A+B enzyme immunoassay for combined detection of stool toxins and toxigenic C. difficile strains.

Authors:  A Lozniewski; C Rabaud; E Dotto; M Weber; F Mory
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Effective detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile by a two-step algorithm including tests for antigen and cytotoxin.

Authors:  John R Ticehurst; Deborah Z Aird; Lisa M Dam; Anita P Borek; John T Hargrove; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Detection of Clostridium difficile toxin: comparison of enzyme immunoassay results with results obtained by cytotoxicity assay.

Authors:  Daniel M Musher; Atisha Manhas; Pranav Jain; Franziska Nuila; Amna Waqar; Nancy Logan; Bernard Marino; Edward A Graviss
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Clostridium difficile-associated colitis.

Authors:  Mark W Hull; Paul L Beck
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Comparison of a commercial real-time PCR assay for tcdB detection to a cell culture cytotoxicity assay and toxigenic culture for direct detection of toxin-producing Clostridium difficile in clinical samples.

Authors:  Paul D Stamper; Romina Alcabasa; Deborah Aird; Wisal Babiker; Jennifer Wehrlin; Ijeoma Ikpeama; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Six rapid tests for direct detection of Clostridium difficile and its toxins in fecal samples compared with the fibroblast cytotoxicity assay.

Authors:  David K Turgeon; Thomas J Novicki; John Quick; LaDonna Carlson; Pat Miller; Bruce Ulness; Anne Cent; Rhoda Ashley; Ann Larson; Marie Coyle; Ajit P Limaye; Brad T Cookson; Thomas R Fritsche
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 10.  Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea: current strategies for diagnosis and therapy.

Authors:  Munshi Moyenuddin; John C Williamson; Christopher A Ohl
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2002-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.