Literature DB >> 1629341

Comparison of the VIDAS Clostridium difficile toxin A immunoassay with C. difficile culture and cytotoxin and latex tests.

C J Shanholtzer1, K E Willard, J J Holter, M M Olson, D N Gerding, L R Peterson.   

Abstract

The VIDAS Clostridium difficile toxin A immunoassay (CDA) is a new, automated, enzyme-linked fluorescent-antibody assay for detection of C. difficile toxin A antigen in stool specimens. Simultaneous, parallel testing was performed by using the VIDAS CDA, the Culturette brand CDT latex test for C. difficile antigens, and conventional laboratory cell culture tests for C. difficile, cytotoxicity and C. difficile culture. One hundred ninety-four consecutive fresh soft or liquid stool samples submitted for C. difficile testing between July and September 1990 were evaluated. Of the 194 samples tested, 19 (10%) were from 16 patients who met our case definition for C. difficile-associated disease. The in vitro tests were evaluated in relation to two forms of a clinical case definition. In one form, a positive culture for toxin-producing C. difficile or a positive cytotoxin result obtained directly from the stool specimen was required as laboratory evidence of C. difficile. In the other, a positive result of any of the four laboratory tests was accepted for the laboratory portion of the case definition. No significant difference between the sensitivity of the VIDAS CDA and that of the Culturette brand CDT latex test was found (48 to 58% sensitivity for the CDT latex test and 52 to 63% sensitivity for the VIDAS CDA compared with 93 to 100% sensitivity for culture and 70 to 100% sensitivity for cytotoxin testing). The performance of the VIDAS CDA, however, was hampered by a high percentage of tests (19%) which gave an uninterpretable result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1629341      PMCID: PMC265390          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.30.7.1837-1840.1992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  10 in total

1.  Nosocomial Clostridium difficile colonisation and disease.

Authors:  S Johnson; C R Clabots; F V Linn; M M Olson; L R Peterson; D N Gerding
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-07-14       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Multicenter evaluation of a new enzyme immunoassay for detection of Clostridium difficile enterotoxin A.

Authors:  P C De Girolami; P A Hanff; K Eichelberger; L Longhi; H Teresa; J Pratt; A Cheng; J M Letourneau; G M Thorne
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of culture, cytotoxicity assays, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for toxin A and toxin B in the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-related enteric disease.

Authors:  R C Walker; P J Ruane; J E Rosenblatt; D M Lyerly; C A Gleaves; T F Smith; P F Pierce; T D Wilkins
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 2.803

4.  Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea and colitis in adults. A prospective case-controlled epidemiologic study.

Authors:  D N Gerding; M M Olson; L R Peterson; D G Teasley; R L Gebhard; M L Schwartz; J T Lee
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1986-01

Review 5.  Clostridium difficile: its disease and toxins.

Authors:  D M Lyerly; H C Krivan; T D Wilkins
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Results of a prospective, 18-month clinical evaluation of culture, cytotoxin testing, and culturette brand (CDT) latex testing in the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.

Authors:  L R Peterson; M M Olson; C J Shanholtzer; D N Gerding
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.803

7.  Detection of Clostridium difficile toxins A (enterotoxin) and B (cytotoxin) in clinical specimens. Evaluation of a latex agglutination test.

Authors:  L R Peterson; J J Holter; C J Shanholtzer; C R Garrett; D N Gerding
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 2.493

8.  Identification of the latex test-reactive protein of Clostridium difficile as glutamate dehydrogenase.

Authors:  D M Lyerly; L A Barroso; T D Wilkins
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Selective and differential medium for isolation of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  W L George; V L Sutter; D Citron; S M Finegold
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 10.  Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea.

Authors:  R A Bowman; T V Riley
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.267

  10 in total
  19 in total

1.  Evaluation of a new enzyme immunoassay for Clostridium difficile toxin A.

Authors:  S O Vargas; D Horensky; A B Onderdonk
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Comparison of four laboratory tests for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.

Authors:  J Jacobs; B Rudensky; J Dresner; A Berman; M Sonnenblick; Y van Dijk; A M Yinnon
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  The Daniel K. Inouye College of Pharmacy Scripts: Updates on Clostridium difficile Infection: Advances in Laboratory Testing to Aid Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Louis Lteif
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2017-02

4.  Rapid stool-based diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection by real-time PCR in a children's hospital.

Authors:  Ruth Ann Luna; Bobby L Boyanton; Seema Mehta; Ebony M Courtney; C Renee Webb; Paula A Revell; James Versalovic
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Clostridium difficile and inflammatory bowel disease: role in pathogenesis and implications in treatment.

Authors:  Orna Nitzan; Mazen Elias; Bibiana Chazan; Raul Raz; Walid Saliba
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Comparison of a commercial real-time PCR assay for tcdB detection to a cell culture cytotoxicity assay and toxigenic culture for direct detection of toxin-producing Clostridium difficile in clinical samples.

Authors:  Paul D Stamper; Romina Alcabasa; Deborah Aird; Wisal Babiker; Jennifer Wehrlin; Ijeoma Ikpeama; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Six rapid tests for direct detection of Clostridium difficile and its toxins in fecal samples compared with the fibroblast cytotoxicity assay.

Authors:  David K Turgeon; Thomas J Novicki; John Quick; LaDonna Carlson; Pat Miller; Bruce Ulness; Anne Cent; Rhoda Ashley; Ann Larson; Marie Coyle; Ajit P Limaye; Brad T Cookson; Thomas R Fritsche
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of three enzyme immunoassays, a cytotoxicity assay, and toxigenic culture for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.

Authors:  F Barbut; C Kajzer; N Planas; J C Petit
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  Clostridium difficile: clinical disease and diagnosis.

Authors:  F C Knoop; M Owens; I C Crocker
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  Correlation between Clostridium difficile bacterial load, commercial real-time PCR cycle thresholds, and results of diagnostic tests based on enzyme immunoassay and cell culture cytotoxicity assay.

Authors:  Léa-Laurence Dionne; Frédéric Raymond; Jacques Corbeil; Jean Longtin; Philippe Gervais; Yves Longtin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.