Literature DB >> 25234867

Evidence for independent time-unit processing of speech using noise promoting or suppressing masking release (L).

Eric W Healy1, Carla L Youngdahl1, Frédéric Apoux1.   

Abstract

The relative independence of time-unit processing during speech reception was examined. It was found that temporally interpolated noise, even at very high levels, had little effect on sentence recognition using masking-release conditions similar to those of Kwon et al. [(2012). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131, 3111-3119]. The current data confirm the earlier conclusions of Kwon et al. involving masking release based on the relative timing of speech and noise. These data also indicate substantial levels of independence in the time domain, which has implications for current theories of speech perception in noise.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25234867      PMCID: PMC3985896          DOI: 10.1121/1.4861363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  15 in total

1.  Sentence recognition in noise promoting or suppressing masking release by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Bomjun J Kwon; Trevor T Perry; Cassie L Wilhelm; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Relative contribution of off- and on-frequency spectral components of background noise to the masking of unprocessed and vocoded speech.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Martin Cooke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Isolating the energetic component of speech-on-speech masking with ideal time-frequency segregation.

Authors:  Douglas S Brungart; Peter S Chang; Brian D Simpson; DeLiang Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Determination of the potential benefit of time-frequency gain manipulation.

Authors:  Michael C Anzalone; Lauren Calandruccio; Karen A Doherty; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Factors influencing intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech: implications for noise reduction.

Authors:  Ning Li; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The masking of speech.

Authors:  G A MILLER
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1947-03       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Auditory induction: reciprocal changes in alternating sounds.

Authors:  R M Warren; J A Bashford; E W Healy; B S Brubaker
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-03

9.  Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.

Authors:  DeLiang Wang; Ulrik Kjems; Michael S Pedersen; Jesper B Boldt; Thomas Lunner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  On the number of auditory filter outputs needed to understand speech: further evidence for auditory channel independence.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Eric W Healy
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  2 in total

1.  The optimal threshold for removing noise from speech is similar across normal and impaired hearing-a time-frequency masking study.

Authors:  Eric W Healy; Jordan L Vasko; DeLiang Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The importance of processing resolution in "ideal time-frequency segregation" of masked speech and the implications for predicting speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Christopher Conroy; Virginia Best; Todd R Jennings; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.840

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.