Literature DB >> 8022918

Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric infusions of dilute polycose solutions.

K Ackroff1, A Sclafani.   

Abstract

Prior studies have obtained strong conditioned preferences (> 90%) for flavors paired with intragastric (IG) infusions of Polycose (hydrolyzed starch) over different flavors paired with IG water infusions. These experiments used concentrated Polycose solutions (16-32%; 0.6-1.2 kcal/ml) that contributed 50% or more of the animals' daily caloric intake. The present experiment sought to determine if calorically dilute solutions would also support preference conditioning. Adult female rats with gastric cannulas were trained with a cue solution (the CS+) paired with Polycose infusions. On alternate days a different cue solution (the CS-) was paired with IG water infusions. The CSs were unsweetened or saccharin-sweetened citric acid and sucrose octaacetate solutions that were available 22 h/day; chow was freely available. Separate groups were infused with Polycose at concentrations of 0.5%, 1%, 2%, and 4% (0.019-0.152 kcal/ml). The three higher concentrations conditioned flavor preferences of up to 89%. The infused Polycose represented only 1-14% of the animals' daily caloric intake and did not reliably reduce chow consumption. These findings demonstrate the sensitivity of the viscerosensory feedback system mediating flavor conditioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8022918     DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)90086-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  9 in total

Review 1.  Gut-brain nutrient signaling. Appetition vs. satiation.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.868

2.  Mixtures of Sweeteners and Maltodextrin Enhance Flavor and Intake of Alcohol in Adolescent Rats.

Authors:  Alice Sardarian; Sophia Liu; Steven L Youngentob; John I Glendinning
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Nutrient-conditioned intake stimulation does not require a distinctive flavor cue in rats.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.868

4.  Latent inhibition in flavor-preference conditioning: effects of motivational state and the nature of the reinforcer.

Authors:  Felisa González; Enrique Morillas; Geoffrey Hall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  The CS-US delay gradient in flavor preference conditioning with intragastric carbohydrate infusions.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Debra Blusk Drucker; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-08-05

6.  Postoral glucose sensing, not caloric content, determines sugar reward in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Steven Zukerman; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  Post-oral fat stimulation of intake and conditioned flavor preference in C57BL/6J mice: A concentration-response study.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-02-28

8.  Flavor change and food deprivation are not critical for post-oral glucose appetition in mice.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-12-04

9.  Post-oral glucose stimulation of intake and conditioned flavor preference in C57BL/6J mice: a concentration-response study.

Authors:  Steven Zukerman; Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2012-11-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.