Literature DB >> 26077443

Latent inhibition in flavor-preference conditioning: effects of motivational state and the nature of the reinforcer.

Felisa González1,2, Enrique Morillas3,4, Geoffrey Hall5,6.   

Abstract

In two experiments, rats received pairings of the flavor of almond with either fructose or maltodextrin, and the conditioned preference for almond was then tested. In each experiment, half of the rats had received prior exposure to almond on its own, and half had received no preexposure. In Experiment 1, in which the rats were hungry during the test, the preference was greater in the nonpreexposed subjects, both for those trained with fructose and those trained with maltodextrin; that is, latent inhibition was obtained with both reinforcers. In Experiment 2, in which the rats were not food deprived prior to the test, not only was there no latent inhibition with either of the reinforcers, but, for both, the preference was greater for preexposed than for nonpreexposed subjects. These results give no support to the proposal that different types of reinforcer generate different types of learning. They are, however, consistent with the proposal that different types of learning control behavior when a rat is hungry and when it is not, and that the form that generates the preference in the latter case is not susceptible to the latent inhibition effect.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conditioning; Flavor preference; Fructose; Latent inhibition; Maltodextrin; Rats

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26077443     DOI: 10.3758/s13420-015-0185-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  18 in total

1.  Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric fructose and glucose: differences in reinforcement potency.

Authors:  K Ackroff; K Touzani; T K Peets; A Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2001-04

2.  Motivational state regulates the content of learned flavor preferences.

Authors:  J A Harris; M C Gorissen; G K Bailey; R F Westbrook
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2000-01

3.  Evaluation and development of a connectionist theory of configural learning.

Authors:  John M Pearce
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-05

4.  Analysis of blocking of flavor-preference conditioning based on nutrients and palatable tastes in rats.

Authors:  Felisa González; David Garcia-Burgos; Geoffrey Hall
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 3.868

5.  Motivational control of latent inhibition in flavor preference conditioning.

Authors:  David Garcia-Burgos; Felisa González; Geoffrey Hall
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Qualitative differences in polysaccharide and sugar tastes in the rat: a two-carbohydrate taste model.

Authors:  J W Nissenbaum; A Sclafani
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Intragastric glucose but not fructose conditions robust flavor preferences in rats.

Authors:  A Sclafani; C Cardieri; K Tucker; D Blusk; K Ackroff
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1993-08

8.  Context conditional flavor preferences in the rat based on fructose and maltodextrin reinforcers.

Authors:  Dominic M Dwyer; Rachel H Quirk
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2008-04

9.  Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric infusions of dilute polycose solutions.

Authors:  K Ackroff; A Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1994-05

10.  Microstructural analysis of conditioned and unconditioned responses to maltodextrin.

Authors:  Dominic M Dwyer
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.986

View more
  2 in total

1.  Circadian-temporal context and latent inhibition of conditioned taste aversion: Effect of restriction in the intake of the conditioned taste stimulus.

Authors:  Andrés Molero-Chamizo
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Facilitation and retardation of flavor preference conditioning following prior exposure to the flavor conditioned stimulus.

Authors:  Enrique Morillas; Felisa González; Geoffrey Hall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.986

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.