Literature DB >> 21840327

The CS-US delay gradient in flavor preference conditioning with intragastric carbohydrate infusions.

Karen Ackroff1, Debra Blusk Drucker, Anthony Sclafani.   

Abstract

Rats are able to associate a flavor with the delayed presentation of food, but the obtained flavor preferences are often weak. The present studies evaluated the effect of delay between a flavor CS and a post-oral nutrient US on the expression of conditioned flavor preferences. In Experiment 1, rats were trained with two CS flavors: one was followed after a delay by intragastric infusion of 8% glucose, and the other was followed after the same delay by intragastric water. Rats trained with 2.5, 10, and 30-min delays expressed significant (84-68%) preferences for the glucose-paired flavor whereas rats trained with 60-min delays were indifferent (51%). Experiment 2 examined flavor conditioning over a 60-min delay using 8 or 16% Polycose based on findings that orally consumed Polycose conditions preferences at this delay interval. The 8 and 16% Polycose infusions produced significant preferences which peaked at 62% and 73%, respectively. The ability to bridge these delays may allow animals to learn about slowly digested foods.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21840327      PMCID: PMC3225728          DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.07.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  45 in total

Review 1.  Sensory pleasure.

Authors:  M Cabanac
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 4.875

2.  "Learned safety" as a mechanism in long-delay taste-aversion learning in rats.

Authors:  J W Kalat; P Rozin
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1973-05

3.  Conditioned flavor preferences based on delayed caloric consequences.

Authors:  E D Capaldi; D H Campbell; J D Sheffer; J P Bradford
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1987-04

4.  Can rats learn to associate a flavour with the delayed delivery of food?

Authors:  L C Simbayi; R A Boakes; M J Burton
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 3.868

5.  Intestinal osmolality and carbohydrate absorption in rats treated with polymerized glucose.

Authors:  F Daum; M I Cohen; H McNamara; L Finberg
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 3.756

6.  Conditioned taste preferences based on caloric density.

Authors:  R C Bolles; L Hayward; C Crandall
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1981-01

7.  Comparison between some digestive processes after eating and gastric loading in rats.

Authors:  F Molina; T Thiel; J A Deutsch; A Puerto
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 3.533

8.  Calories and gastric emptying: a regulatory capacity with implications for feeding.

Authors:  P R McHugh; T H Moran
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1979-05

9.  Oral stimulation alters digestion of intragastric oil meals in rats.

Authors:  I Ramirez
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1985-04

10.  Early experience and reinforcer quality in delayed flavour-food learning in the rat.

Authors:  R A Boakes; C Rossi-Arnaud; V Garcia-Hoz
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.868

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Role of gut nutrient sensing in stimulating appetite and conditioning food preferences.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.619

2.  Nutrient-conditioned intake stimulation does not require a distinctive flavor cue in rats.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.868

3.  Rapid post-oral stimulation of intake and flavor conditioning by glucose and fat in the mouse.

Authors:  Steven Zukerman; Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.619

4.  Another look at the extinction of conditioned flavor preferences: Amount of training and tests for spontaneous recovery.

Authors:  Andrew R Delamater; Norman Tu; Jasmine Huang
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Exposures to conditioned flavours with different hedonic values induce contrasted behavioural and brain responses in pigs.

Authors:  Caroline Clouard; Mélanie Jouhanneau; Marie-Christine Meunier-Salaün; Charles-Henri Malbert; David Val-Laillet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.