Literature DB >> 22038720

Importance of binocular vision in foot placement accuracy when stepping onto a floor-based target during gait initiation.

Graham J Chapman1, Andy Scally, John G Buckley.   

Abstract

This study investigated the importance of binocular vision to foot placement accuracy when stepping onto a floor-based target during gait initiation. Starting from stationary, participants placed alternate feet onto targets sequentially positioned along a straight travel path with the added constraint that the initial target (target 1) could move in the medio-lateral (M-L) direction. Repeated trials when target 1 remained stationary or moved laterally at the instant of lead-limb toe-off (TO) or 200 ms after TO (early swing) were undertaken under binocular and monocular viewing. Catch trials when target 1 shifted medially were also undertaken. Foot-reach kinematics, foot trajectory corrections and foot placement accuracy for the step onto target 1 were determined via 3D motion analyses. Peak foot-reach velocity and initial foot-reach duration were unaffected by vision condition but terminal foot-reach duration was prolonged under monocular conditions (p = 0.002). Foot trajectory alteration onsets were unaffected by vision condition, but onsets occurred sooner when the target shifted in early swing compared to at TO (p = 0.033). M-L foot placement accuracy decreased (p = 0.025) and variability increased (p = 0.05) under monocular conditions, particularly when stepping onto the moving target. There was no difference between vision conditions in A-P foot placement accuracy. Results indicate that monocular vision provides sufficient information to determine stepping distance and correctly transport the foot towards the target but binocular vision is required to attain a precise M-L foot placement; particularly so when stepping onto a moving target. These findings are in agreement with those found in the reaching and grasping literature, indicating that binocular vision is important for end-point precision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22038720     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2910-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  34 in total

1.  The Topology of Limb Deceleration in Prehension Tasks.

Authors:  F. T. J. M. Zaal; R. J. Bootsma
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Predictive control of body mass trajectory in a two-step sequence.

Authors:  Ian N Lyon; Brian L Day
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Evidence that older adult fallers prioritise the planning of future stepping actions over the accurate execution of ongoing steps during complex locomotor tasks.

Authors:  G J Chapman; M A Hollands
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  The imprecision of stereopsis.

Authors:  S P McKee; D M Levi; S F Bowne
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Comparing measures of monocular distance perception: verbal and reaching errors are not correlated.

Authors:  C C Pagano; G P Bingham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Control of frontal plane body motion in human stepping.

Authors:  I N Lyon; B L Day
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Age-related differences in visual sampling requirements during adaptive locomotion.

Authors:  Graham John Chapman; Mark Andrew Hollands
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  What drives adaptive gait changes to acutely presented monocular blur?

Authors:  Graham J Chapman; Andy Scally; David B Elliott
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Binocular vision and the on-line control of human prehension.

Authors:  P Servos; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance.

Authors:  Andrea Loftus; Philip Servos; Melvyn A Goodale; Nicole Mendarozqueta; Mark Mon-Williams
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  4 in total

1.  Age- and stereovision-dependent eye-hand coordination deficits in children with amblyopia and abnormal binocularity.

Authors:  Simon Grant; Catherine Suttle; Dean R Melmoth; Miriam L Conway; John J Sloper
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 2.  Ageing vision and falls: a review.

Authors:  Liana Nafisa Saftari; Oh-Sang Kwon
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 2.867

3.  Vision Development Differences between Slow and Fast Motor Development in Typical Developing Toddlers: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Elena Pinero-Pinto; Verónica Pérez-Cabezas; Concepción De-Hita-Cantalejo; Carmen Ruiz-Molinero; Estanislao Gutiérrez-Sánchez; José-Jesús Jiménez-Rejano; José-María Sánchez-González; María Carmen Sánchez-González
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Newly acquired fear of falling leads to altered eye movement patterns and reduced stepping safety: a case study.

Authors:  William R Young; Mark A Hollands
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.