Literature DB >> 7987106

Intercultural consultations: investigation of factors that deter non-English speaking women from attending their general practitioners for cervical screening.

J Naish1, J Brown, B Denton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the factors that deter ethnic minority women living in east London from attending their general practitioner for cervical cytology screening.
DESIGN: Qualitative study by means of focus group discussions between October 1993 and March 1994.
SETTING: East London.
SUBJECTS: Non-health specific established community groups and specially convened groups of Bengali, Kurdish, Turkish, Urdu and Punjabi, and Chinese speaking women. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The spontaneous views of non-English speaking women resident in east London on cervical screening, focusing on attitudes to screening, their experiences of the cervical cytology screening services as currently provided, and their knowledge and beliefs about cervical screening.
RESULTS: Some reported attitudinal barriers to cervical cytology screening such as fear of cancer were not deterrents. Administrative and language barriers were more important, as were inadequate surgery premises and concerns about sterility.
CONCLUSION: Contrary to popular belief among general practitioners in east London, women from ethnic minorities are enthusiastic about cervical cytology screening once they understand the purpose of the test and the call and recall procedures. It is possible to consult with community groups in their own language through focus group discussions, working with bilingual health advocates who have had a short practical training in facilitating small group discussions. This form of user consultation could be carried out focusing on other aspects of health promotion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7987106      PMCID: PMC2541951     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  10 in total

1.  Differential response to recall in a cervical screening programme.

Authors:  C D Sansom; J MacInerney; V Oliver; J Wakefield
Journal:  Br J Prev Soc Med       Date:  1975-03

2.  The quest for normoglycaemia: is it worth the effort?

Authors:  J I Mann
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1990-06-27

3.  Evaluation of the cervical cytology screening programme in an inner city health district.

Authors:  R Beardow; J Oerton; C Victor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-07-08

4.  Screening: the inadequacy of population registers.

Authors:  A Bowling; B Jacobson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-03-04

5.  Investigation of non-responders at a cervical cancer screening clinic in Manchester.

Authors:  V Nathoo
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-04-09

6.  Patient preferences for cervical cytology.

Authors:  D E Cullum; J N Savory
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-07-30

7.  Cervical cytology screening and government policy.

Authors:  S K Ross
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-07-08

8.  Prospective randomised controlled trial of methods of call and recall for cervical cytology screening.

Authors:  M Pierce; S Lundy; A Palanisamy; S Winning; J King
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-07-15

9.  Cervical screening in an inner city area: response to a call system in general practice.

Authors:  K J Shroff; A M Corrigan; M Bosher; M P Edmonds; D Sacks; D V Coleman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-11-19

10.  Reasons for non-attendance for computer-managed cervical screening: pilot interviews.

Authors:  A K Elkind; D Haran; A Eardley; B Spencer
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.634

  10 in total
  30 in total

Review 1.  Screening for cervical cancer: a review of women's attitudes, knowledge, and behaviour.

Authors:  F Fylan
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Linkworkers in primary care.

Authors:  S Gillam; R Levenson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-11-06

3.  Health care services and Pap testing behavior for Chinese women in British Columbia.

Authors:  T Gregory Hislop; Kelsey M Inrig; Chris D Bajdik; Michele Deschamps; Shin-Ping Tu; Victoria M Taylor
Journal:  J Immigr Health       Date:  2003-10

4.  Qualitative methods in research on healthcare quality.

Authors:  C Pope; P van Royen; R Baker
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-06

5.  Missed opportunities for tuberculosis screening in primary care.

Authors:  Yuri F van der Heijden; William J Heerman; Sara McFadden; Yuwei Zhu; Barron L Patterson
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 6.  The need for more research on language barriers in health care: a proposed research agenda.

Authors:  Elizabeth Jacobs; Alice H M Chen; Leah S Karliner; Niels Agger-Gupta; Sunita Mutha
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.911

7.  Primary health-care delivery gaps among medically underserved Asian American and Pacific Islander populations.

Authors:  Rosy Chang Weir; Winston Tseng; Irene H Yen; Jeffrey Caballero
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 8.  Providing primary health care to immigrants and refugees: the North Hamilton experience.

Authors:  N Fowler
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-08-25       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  The Right to Accessible and Acceptable Healthcare Services. Negotiating Rules and Solutions With Members of Ethnocultural Minorities.

Authors:  Fabio Macioce
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 1.352

10.  Hepatitis B screening in the Turkish-Dutch population in Rotterdam, the Netherlands; qualitative assessment of socio-cultural determinants.

Authors:  Ytje Jj van der Veen; Onno de Zwart; Hélène Acm Voeten; Johan P Mackenbach; Jan Hendrik Richardus
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.