Literature DB >> 8333444

Are there differences in information given to private and public prenatal patients?

M C Freda1, H F Andersen, K Damus, I R Merkatz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In 1989 the United States Public Health Service Expert Panel on the Content of Prenatal Care reported that health education should become a more integral part of prenatal care. Key questions about providing this education have not been examined. Our study compared the type of information provided to women who sought prenatal care in a public clinic and to those who were seen in a private practice and the degree to which the patients were satisfied with the information they received. STUDY
DESIGN: One hundred fifty-nine pregnant women (80 seen in a public clinic, 79 seen in a private practice) completed two questionnaires about 38 topics commonly cited as important during pregnancy. At the first prenatal visit, the women reported their level of interest in each of the topics. At 36 to 40 weeks' gestation the women completed a second questionnaire to assess whether information was provided for each topic and whether they had learned as much as desired.
RESULTS: Overall, the women in the public sector received more information than did the women who were cared for privately. This was statistically significant at the p < 0.05 level for 25 of the 38 topics. Satisfaction with information learned was highly correlated with information received during prenatal care, but, surprisingly, it was not shown to be associated with the patient's interest level at the first visit. Fewer than 50% of private patients reported having received information about such important topics as acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, sexually transmitted diseases, preterm birth prevention, family planning, and family violence.
CONCLUSIONS: The one-on-one approach to health education in pregnancy usually used in the private setting may not facilitate addressing many topics believed to be important components of contemporary prenatal care. Providers of private prenatal care should initiate discussion of prenatal health education topics rather than relying on patient interest in requesting information. Just as public prenatal care programs have devoted significant resources to more comprehensive prenatal education, the providers in the private sector must assure that pregnant women receive the same comprehensive information. In so doing, these providers can help promote an optimal outcome for their patients, their patients' unborn children, and the family unit.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health; New York City; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8333444     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90153-a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  8 in total

1.  Extent of documented adherence to recommended prenatal care content: provider site differences and effect on outcomes among low-income women.

Authors:  Arden Handler; Kristin Rankin; Deborah Rosenberg; Karabi Sinha
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-02

Review 2.  Outcomes of enhanced prenatal services for Medicaid-eligible women in public and private settings.

Authors:  L Simpson; C Korenbrot; J Greene
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  The impact on clients of a community-based infant mortality reduction program: the National Healthy Start Program Survey of Postpartum Women.

Authors:  M C McCormick; L W Deal; B L Devaney; D Chu; L Moreno; K T Raykovich
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Ethnic disparity in the performance of prenatal nutrition risk assessment among Medicaid-eligible women.

Authors:  E Fuentes-Afflick; C C Korenbrot; J Greene
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  A Longitudinal Study of Changes in Prenatal Care Utilization Between First and Second Births and Low Birth Weight.

Authors:  Christine T Loftus; Orion T Stewart; Mark D Hensley; Daniel A Enquobahrie; Stephen E Hawes
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-12

6.  Disparities in reported prenatal care advice from health care providers among women of Mexican origin in California.

Authors:  R Sarnoff; E Adams; H Shauffler; B Abrams
Journal:  J Immigr Health       Date:  2001-04

7.  Comparing mothers' reports on the content of prenatal care received with recommended national guidelines for care.

Authors:  M D Kogan; G R Alexander; M Kotelchuck; D A Nagey; B W Jack
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 8.  Women's experience of prenatal care: an integrative review.

Authors:  Gina Novick
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.388

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.