Literature DB >> 6696151

Preventive content of adult primary care: do generalists and subspecialists differ?

A J Dietrich, H Goldberg.   

Abstract

We compared preventive care performed by 20 generalists and 20 subspecialists practicing in Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties, California, by auditing charts of adult primary care patients for compliance with recommendations of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. Generalists and subspecialists both provided 49 per cent of recommended preventive services. The two groups did not differ significantly in performance of any individual service. Performance varied widely within both groups. Of many factors explored, only two were associated with more preventive services: provision of a complete physical examination to the patient, and a physician's belief in the importance of a given service. The "generalist vs. subspecialist" debate assumes that a physician's specialty classification is an important predictor of behavior. For the performance of preventive care, this was not true in our study. Instead, physicians' beliefs and practice habits may be major determinants of the quality of preventive care provided. These exploratory findings needed confirmation in other settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6696151      PMCID: PMC1651470          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.74.3.223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  13 in total

1.  Validating the content of pediatric outpatient medical records by means of tape-recording doctor-patient encounters.

Authors:  Z E Zuckerman; B Starfield; C Hochreiter; B Kovasznay
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Toward the measurement of primary care.

Authors:  C Holmes; R L Kane; M Ford; J Fowler
Journal:  Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc       Date:  1978

3.  Measuring the attainment of primary care.

Authors:  B Starfield
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1979-05

4.  The place of the general internist in primary care.

Authors:  M L Peterson
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  A national study of medical and surgical specialties. III. An empirical approach to the classification of patient care.

Authors:  R C Mendenhall; C E Lewis; G P DeFlorio; R A Girard
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1979-05-18       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Periodic health screening in a rural private practice.

Authors:  P S Frame
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 0.493

7.  The contribution of specialists to the delivery of primary care.

Authors:  L H Aiken; C E Lewis; J Craig; R C Mendenhall; R J Blendon; D E Rogers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-06-14       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Problems with medical records.

Authors:  H M Tufo; J J Speidel
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1971 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Physician-based group insurance. A proposal for medical cost control.

Authors:  F O Evans
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  The periodic health examination: comparison of recommendations and internists' performance.

Authors:  F J Romm; S W Fletcher; B S Hulka
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 0.954

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  Knowledge, patterns of care, and outcomes of care for generalists and specialists.

Authors:  L R Harrold; T S Field; J H Gurwitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Participant evaluation and cost of a community-based health promotion program for elders.

Authors:  J Rogers; R Grower; P Supino
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Medical residents' colorectal cancer screening may be dependent on ambulatory care education.

Authors:  M L Borum
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Screening for hypercholesterolaemia in primary care: randomised controlled trial of postal questionnaire appraising risk of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  B Hutchison; S Birch; C E Evans; L J Goldsmith; B A Markham; J Frank; M Paterson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-04-18

5.  Papanicolaou testing by physicians in manitoba: who does them?

Authors:  M M Cohen; K M Hammarstrand
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Randomized, controlled trial in a private practice: A methods paper.

Authors:  W E Hogg; G Satenstein; H Crouch
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Use of an outpatient medical record audit to achieve educational objectives: changes in residents' performances over six years.

Authors:  D E Kern; W L Harris; B O Boekeloo; L R Barker; P Hogeland
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Promoting preventive care: changing reimbursement is not enough.

Authors:  S J McPhee; S A Schroeder
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  An evaluation of vignettes for predicting variation in the quality of preventive care.

Authors:  Timothy R Dresselhaus; John W Peabody; Jeff Luck; Dan Bertenthal
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  A strategy to improve the utilization of pneumococcal vaccine.

Authors:  C M Clancy; D Gelfman; R M Poses
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.