Literature DB >> 3550165

US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer with breast self-examination. A critical review.

M S O'Malley, S W Fletcher.   

Abstract

We reviewed evidence regarding breast self-examination (BSE) and screening for breast cancer. To our knowledge, no controlled prospective trial links BSE to lives saved from breast cancer. Compared with clinical breast examination and mammography, the estimated sensitivity of BSE is low (20% to 30%) and is lower among older women. The potential sensitivity of BSE should be higher because women can detect small lumps (0.3 cm) in silicone models. Instruction increases BSE frequency over the short term. Sensitivity also increases, but specificity decreases. The psychological effects of teaching and performing BSE are not yet clear. The cost of screening by BSE is unknown but depends on the accuracy of the test as well as the training method used. Breast self-examination has potential as a screening test for breast cancer, but many questions require scientific examination before this procedure can be advocated as a screening test for breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3550165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  26 in total

1.  Is it time to stop teaching breast self-examination?

Authors:  L Nekhlyudov; S W Fletcher
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-06-26       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  When statistics provide unsatisfying answers: revisiting the breast self-examination controversy.

Authors:  Barron H Lerner
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Patient Barriers to Mammography Identified During a Reminder Program.

Authors:  Adrianne C Feldstein; Nancy Perrin; A Gabriela Rosales; Jennifer Schneider; Mary M Rix; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Practice of breast self examination: disease extent at diagnosis and patterns of surgical care. A report from an Italian study. GIVIO (Interdisciplinary Group for Cancer Care Evaluation).

Authors: 
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Relative effectiveness of methods of breast self-examination.

Authors:  E Atkins; L J Solomon; J K Worden; R S Foster
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1991-08

6.  Preventive Care for the Elderly: Uncovering the unmet needs of this population.

Authors:  L Mallery; K Rockwood
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 7.  Physical diagnosis versus modern technology. A review.

Authors:  F T Fitzgerald
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1990-04

8.  Cancer rate differentials between blacks and whites of three metropolitan areas.

Authors:  M A Haynes; G Wolde-Tsadik; C P Brown; K Semenya; O I Ahmed; G A McGrady
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 1.798

9.  The practice of breast self-examination results in the earlier detection and better clinical course of Japanese women with breast cancer.

Authors:  J Kurebayashi; K Shimozuma; H Sonoo
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 10.  Screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Katrina Armstrong; Constance D Lehman; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.