Literature DB >> 3926256

Survey of physicians' attitudes and practices in early cancer detection.

.   

Abstract

Most primary care physicians are already involved in some form of cancer detection in asymptomatic patients, and most say their involvement is increasing. With the exception of the proctoscopic examination and mammography, major detection procedures are being used with asymptomatic patients by a majority of physicians. In many instances, physicians' use of detection procedures does not conform with guidelines for the cancer-related checkup recommended by the American Cancer Society. Although they may disagree with some guidelines, most physicians agree they are generally helpful. Physicians disagree with guidelines for mammography, because they feel the cost of the test and radiation exposure associated with its use argue against patients' being tested annually, or being tested at all in the absence of symptoms. In contrast, belief that testing is needed at least once a year is the basis for physicians' disagreement with Pap test guidelines. Physicians also resist discontinuing use of the chest x-ray for early cancer detection, because they want to screen smokers annually. While there is substantial agreement on the value of proctoscopy in cancer detection in asymptomatic people, many physicians are not doing a proctoscopic exam if a patient's stool blood test is negative. Patient fear, discomfort, and the cost of testing influence physician decisions against proctoscopic examination. However, the growing interest in flexible sigmoidoscopy may change attitudes and influence practice toward more general use of proctoscopy. Primary care physicians widely support cancer education, both for the public and with patients in their own practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3926256     DOI: 10.3322/canjclin.35.4.197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin        ISSN: 0007-9235            Impact factor:   508.702


  17 in total

1.  Residents' attitudes towards and skills in counseling: using undetected standardized patients.

Authors:  R B Hoppe; L J Farquhar; R Henry; B Stoffelmayr
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Implementation of cancer prevention guidelines in clinical practice.

Authors:  S J McPhee; J A Bird
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Urban black women's perceptions of breast cancer and mammography.

Authors:  J H Price; S M Desmond; S Slenker; D Smith; P W Stewart
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1992-08

4.  Sigmoidoscopy for all?

Authors:  R V Birtwhistle
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Training primary care physicians in flexible sigmoidoscopy--performance evaluation of 17,167 procedures.

Authors:  H D Groveman; R A Sanowski; M R Klauber
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1988-02

6.  Periodic health examination: comparison of residency programs and national recommendations.

Authors:  K Goldenberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Utilization of sigmoidoscopy by family physicians in Canada.

Authors:  S R Glaser
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-02-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 8.  The pros and cons of fecal occult blood testing for colorectal neoplasms.

Authors:  J B Simon
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.264

9.  Breast cancer screening among relatives of women with breast cancer.

Authors:  K M Kaplan; G B Weinberg; A Small; J L Herndon
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Factors associated with the use of screening mammography in a primary care setting.

Authors:  R E Schoen; M Marcus; R L Braham
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1994-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.