Literature DB >> 7923553

Therapeutic response and potential pitfalls in phase I clinical trials of anticancer agents conducted in Japan.

K Itoh1, Y Sasaki, Y Miyata, H Fujii, T Ohtsu, H Wakita, T Igarashi, K Abe.   

Abstract

The published reports of phase I clinical trials of anticancer agents conducted in Japan from 1981 to 1991 were reviewed. A total of 56 clinical studies that evaluated 38 different agents were reviewed. An average of five agents were studied each year. A total of 2200 patients had been recruited into the 56 clinical trials conducted during this period. A total of 91 patients (4.1%) responded to the treatment, with 23 showing a complete response (1.1%) and 48, a partial response (2.2%). In all, 62% of the responses were observed when patients were treated with doses ranging from 76% to 125% of the recommended doses for phase II studies. The response rates obtained for hematological malignancies were higher than those reported for other malignancies. The past status of phase I clinical trials in Japan can be summarized as follows. (1) A median of seven institutes participated in a single trial. The number of institutes participating correlated with the number of patients enrolled. However, too many institutes participated in a single phase I clinical trial in some studies. (2) The median duration of study for the clinical trials was 14 months. The duration of study was too long in some studies, considering the small number of patients enrolled. In conclusion, the methodology of phase I clinical trials of anticancer agents conducted in Japan should be improved in an efficient and scientific manner, especially for the testing of imported agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7923553     DOI: 10.1007/bf00685653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  6 in total

Review 1.  Choice of starting dose and escalation for phase I studies of antitumor agents.

Authors:  J S Penta; G L Rosner; D L Trump
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  Responses and toxic deaths in phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  G Decoster; G Stein; E E Holdener
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Therapeutic response in phase I trials of antineoplastic agents.

Authors:  E Estey; D Hoth; R Simon; S Marsoni; B Leyland-Jones; R Wittes
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1986-09

4.  Phase I study of weekly intravenous infusions of CPT-11, a new derivative of camptothecin, in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  S Negoro; M Fukuoka; N Masuda; M Takada; Y Kusunoki; K Matsui; N Takifuji; S Kudoh; H Niitani; T Taguchi
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1991-08-21       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Response rates, duration of response, and dose response effects in phase I studies of antineoplastics.

Authors:  D D Von Hoff; J Turner
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.850

6.  Potential roles for preclinical pharmacology in phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  J M Collins; D S Zaharko; R L Dedrick; B A Chabner
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1986-01
  6 in total
  11 in total

1.  American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: the critical role of phase I trials in cancer research and treatment.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Weber; Laura A Levit; Peter C Adamson; Suanna Bruinooge; Howard A Burris; Michael A Carducci; Adam P Dicker; Mithat Gönen; Stephen M Keefe; Michael A Postow; Michael A Thompson; David M Waterhouse; Susan L Weiner; Lynn M Schuchter
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Outcomes of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated in a phase I clinic.

Authors:  Filip Janku; Apostolia M Tsimberidou; Xuemei Wang; David S Hong; Aung Naing; Jing Gong; Ignacio Garrido-Laguna; Henrique A Parsons; Ralph G Zinner; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-02-21

3.  Characteristics and outcomes of breast cancer patients enrolled in the National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program sponsored phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  Filipa Lynce; Matthew J Blackburn; Ling Cai; Heping Wang; Larry Rubinstein; Pamela Harris; Claudine Isaacs; Paula R Pohlmann
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Concentration-dependent Early Antivascular and Antitumor Effects of Itraconazole in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  David E Gerber; William C Putnam; Farjana J Fattah; Kemp H Kernstine; Rolf A Brekken; Ivan Pedrosa; Rachael Skelton; Jessica M Saltarski; Robert E Lenkinski; Richard D Leff; Chul Ahn; Chyndhri Padmanabhan; Vaidehi Chembukar; Sahba Kasiri; Raja Reddy Kallem; Indhumathy Subramaniyan; Qing Yuan; Quyen N Do; Yin Xi; Scott I Reznik; Lorraine Pelosof; Brandon Faubert; Ralph J DeBerardinis; James Kim
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  The impact of an educational DVD on cancer patients considering participation in a phase I clinical trial.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Strevel; Colin Newman; Gregory R Pond; Martha MacLean; Lillian L Siu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.359

6.  Dose-levels and first signs of efficacy in contemporary oncology phase 1 clinical trials.

Authors:  Charles Ferte; Jean-Charles Soria; Nicolas Penel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Patients in phase I trials of anti-cancer agents in Japan: motivation, comprehension and expectations.

Authors:  K Itoh; Y Sasaki; H Fujii; T Ohtsu; H Wakita; T Igarashi; K Abe
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Clinical benefit in Phase-I trials of novel molecularly targeted agents: does dose matter?

Authors:  S Postel-Vinay; H-T Arkenau; D Olmos; J Ang; J Barriuso; S Ashley; U Banerji; J De-Bono; I Judson; S Kaye
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Further evidence of clinical benefit associated with participation in phase I oncology trials.

Authors:  M Markman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Analyses of selected safety endpoints in phase 1 and late-phase clinical trials of anti-PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors: prediction of immune-related toxicities.

Authors:  Ricardo Costa; Rubens B Costa; Sarah M Talamantes; Irene Helenoswki; Benedito A Carneiro; Young Kwang Chae; William J Gradishar; Razelle Kurzrock; Francis J Giles
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-06-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.