Literature DB >> 3527410

Therapeutic response in phase I trials of antineoplastic agents.

E Estey, D Hoth, R Simon, S Marsoni, B Leyland-Jones, R Wittes.   

Abstract

We analyzed the therapeutic effect reported in 187 phase I trials of 54 anticancer drugs introduced into National Cancer Institute-sponsored clinical trial from 1974 to 1982. An additional 12 drugs entering clinical trial prior to 1974 were also examined. Objective responses (partial and complete) were reported in 271 of the 6447 patients (4.2%). Thirty-nine percent of the patients were treated at an initial dose level greater than or equal to the dose ultimately recommended for phase II trials. Patients in phase I trials generally had adequate performance status (Karnofsky scale greater than 80% or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0, 1, or 2). More than 90% of the patients had received prior chemotherapy. We next examined the therapeutic effect observed in phase II trials for each of the drugs. Thirty-eight of the 54 drugs had completed at least one phase II trial. Twenty-one drugs were rated active, and nine were rated inactive. For the drugs entering clinical trial since 1974, the median phase I response rate for those active in phase II was 4.3%, compared to 2.7% for the drugs not found active in phase II. This difference was not statistically significant. The tabulated response rate in phase I trials reported here should be interpreted cautiously. There are many factors which may contribute to significant variability in the reported response rates, including the heterogeneity of patient population with respect to prior therapy and tumor type, lack of requirement for measurable/evaluable disease on entry into many studies, and variations in the rigor with which tumor sites are followed for response. These factors may lead to either an overestimate or underestimate of the true response rate in phase I. Although little therapeutic effect is produced in phase I, we discuss several measures which might increase patient benefit during these trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3527410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep        ISSN: 0361-5960


  37 in total

Review 1.  Ethical issues in the development of new agents.

Authors:  C K Daugherty
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.850

2.  Therapeutic optimism in the consent forms of phase 1 gene transfer trials: an empirical analysis.

Authors:  J Kimmelman; N Palmour
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Prognostic factors among cancer patients with good performance status screened for phase I trials.

Authors:  Nicolas Penel; Marie Vanseymortier; Marie-Edith Bonneterre; Stéphanie Clisant; Eric Dansin; Yvette Vendel; Régis Beuscart; Jacques Bonneterre
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2007-09-22       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  "Classical 3 + 3 design" versus "accelerated titration designs": analysis of 270 phase 1 trials investigating anti-cancer agents.

Authors:  Nicolas Penel; Nicolas Isambert; Pierre Leblond; Charles Ferte; Alain Duhamel; Jacques Bonneterre
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 5.  Current status of MEK inhibitors in the treatment of plexiform neurofibromas.

Authors:  Andrea M Gross; Eva Dombi; Brigitte C Widemann
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 6.  New drug development for pediatric oncology.

Authors:  S Weitman; L Carlson; C B Pratt
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.850

7.  American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: the critical role of phase I trials in cancer research and treatment.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Weber; Laura A Levit; Peter C Adamson; Suanna Bruinooge; Howard A Burris; Michael A Carducci; Adam P Dicker; Mithat Gönen; Stephen M Keefe; Michael A Postow; Michael A Thompson; David M Waterhouse; Susan L Weiner; Lynn M Schuchter
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Precision medicine needs randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Everardo D Saad; Xavier Paoletti; Tomasz Burzykowski; Marc Buyse
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 66.675

9.  Clinical outcomes and survival of advanced renal cancer patients in phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  Laeeq Malik; Helen Parsons; Devalingam Mahalingam; Benjamin Ehler; Martin Goros; Alex Mejia; Andrew Brenner; John Sarantopoulos
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 2.872

10.  Antitumor drug cross-resistance in vivo in a cisplatin-resistant murine P388 leukemia.

Authors:  W R Waud; S D Harrison; K S Gilbert; W R Laster; D P Griswold
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.