Literature DB >> 3753662

Potential roles for preclinical pharmacology in phase I clinical trials.

J M Collins, D S Zaharko, R L Dedrick, B A Chabner.   

Abstract

Concepts elucidated from preclinical pharmacology studies have made a substantial impact on the clinical use of anticancer drugs. However, the majority of animal pharmacology results have not been available until after drugs have entered clinical trials. Since clinical pharmacokinetic measurements are already part of many phase I trials, human data could be directly compared with mouse data if mouse pharmacology studies were completed before clinical trials were initiated. Once the starting dose in a phase I clinical trial has been evaluated, subsequent doses are escalated until the maximum tolerated dose is reached. The rate of escalation is empirically defined by a modified Fibonacci series. This universal escalation scheme is applied to all drugs, with no modifications based upon pharmacology or other factors. If the starting dose is far removed from the maximum tolerated dose, a large number of dose escalations are required. Consequently, most patients receive subtherapeutic doses, and the amount of resources allocated to each drug increases. We are exploring potential strategies for controlling the rate of dose escalation based upon pharmacokinetic determinations in mouse and man. Retrospective analyses indicate that 20%-50% savings in the total number of dose escalations are possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3753662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep        ISSN: 0361-5960


  46 in total

1.  Phase I studies of weekly administration of cytotoxic agents: implications of a mathematical model.

Authors:  Donna K McClish; John D Roberts
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 2.  Statistics in clinical trials.

Authors:  Stephanie J Green; Donna K Pauler
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic guided trial design in oncology.

Authors:  Ch van Kesteren; R A A Mathôt; J H Beijnen; J H M Schellens
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 4.  Mechanistic models for myelosuppression.

Authors:  Lena E Friberg; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 5.  Choice of starting dose and escalation for phase I studies of antitumor agents.

Authors:  J S Penta; G L Rosner; D L Trump
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 6.  Clinical pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of anticancer drugs.

Authors:  W E Evans; M V Relling
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  A phase I study of meta-azidopyrimethamine ethanesulphonate (MZPES)--a new dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor.

Authors:  N S Stuart; S M Crawford; G R Blackledge; E S Newlands; J Slack; R Hoffman; M F Stevens
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.333

8.  Phase I and pharmacokinetic studies with the pentacyclic pyrroloquinone mitoquidone.

Authors:  P A Speth; M E Gore; A J Pateman; D R Newell; J A Bishop; W J Ellis; J A Green; L A Gumbrell; P C Linssen; A Miller
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.333

9.  Phase I clinical trial of CEP-2563 dihydrochloride, a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with refractory solid tumors.

Authors:  Samir D Undevia; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Ann M Mauer; Linda Janisch; Sridhar Mani; Mark J Ratain
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.850

10.  Differences in N-acetylation of the experimental antitumor agent batracylin in the mouse and the rat.

Authors:  M M Ames; D A Mathiesen; J M Reid
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.850

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.