Literature DB >> 1827432

Response rates, duration of response, and dose response effects in phase I studies of antineoplastics.

D D Von Hoff1, J Turner.   

Abstract

Over a period of 14 years, 7,960 patients were treated in 228 phase I trials. In these patients, there were 75 complete and 432 partial responses for an overall objective response rate of 6%. Complete responses lasted a median of six months (range 1-18), while partial responses lasted a median of three months (range 1-17). Of note is that no drug has made it to the market which has not had a response in phase I trials. Responses were noted in very diverse histologic types of tumors. Although there were responses at doses which were as low as 3-5% of the recommended dose for phase II trials, the majority of responses did occur at 80-120% of the dose recommended for phase II trials. Although the response rate in phase I trials is indeed low, responses do occur. This response rate information should help the clinician provide facts for the patient considering a phase I trial with new anticancer agents. These findings also emphasize that although phase I trials are characteristically dose-finding studies, if no responses are noted in phase I studies, it is unlikely the drug will be used routinely in the clinic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1827432     DOI: 10.1007/bf00194562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest New Drugs        ISSN: 0167-6997            Impact factor:   3.850


  6 in total

1.  The effect of measuring error on the results of therapeutic trials in advanced cancer.

Authors:  C G Moertel; J A Hanley
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  The National Cancer Institute antitumor drug discovery program, current and future perspectives: a commentary.

Authors:  J M Venditti
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1983-09

3.  Clinical predictivity of transplantable tumor systems in the selection of new drugs for solid tumors: rationale for a three-stage strategy.

Authors:  M J Staquet; D P Byar; S B Green; M Rozencweig
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1983-09

4.  Activity of mitoxantrone in a human tumor cloning system.

Authors:  D D Von Hoff; C A Coltman; B Forseth
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Quantitation of differential sensitivity of human-tumor stem cells to anticancer drugs.

Authors:  S E Salmon; A W Hamburger; B Soehnlen; B G Durie; D S Alberts; T E Moon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-06-15       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Phase I clinical investigation of 9,10-anthracenedicarboxaldehyde bis[(4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-2-yl)hydrazone] dihydrochloride with correlative in vitro human tumor clonogenic assay.

Authors:  D S Alberts; C Mackel; R Pocelinko; S E Salmon
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 12.701

  6 in total
  39 in total

Review 1.  Choice of starting dose and escalation for phase I studies of antitumor agents.

Authors:  J S Penta; G L Rosner; D L Trump
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 2.  Ethical issues in the development of new agents.

Authors:  C K Daugherty
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.850

3.  Therapeutic optimism in the consent forms of phase 1 gene transfer trials: an empirical analysis.

Authors:  J Kimmelman; N Palmour
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Prognostic factors among cancer patients with good performance status screened for phase I trials.

Authors:  Nicolas Penel; Marie Vanseymortier; Marie-Edith Bonneterre; Stéphanie Clisant; Eric Dansin; Yvette Vendel; Régis Beuscart; Jacques Bonneterre
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2007-09-22       Impact factor: 3.850

5.  Early phase clinical trials: communicating the uncertainties of 'magnitude of benefit' and 'likelihood of benefit'.

Authors:  Nancy E Kass
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  "Classical 3 + 3 design" versus "accelerated titration designs": analysis of 270 phase 1 trials investigating anti-cancer agents.

Authors:  Nicolas Penel; Nicolas Isambert; Pierre Leblond; Charles Ferte; Alain Duhamel; Jacques Bonneterre
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 7.  New drug development for pediatric oncology.

Authors:  S Weitman; L Carlson; C B Pratt
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.850

8.  American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: the critical role of phase I trials in cancer research and treatment.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Weber; Laura A Levit; Peter C Adamson; Suanna Bruinooge; Howard A Burris; Michael A Carducci; Adam P Dicker; Mithat Gönen; Stephen M Keefe; Michael A Postow; Michael A Thompson; David M Waterhouse; Susan L Weiner; Lynn M Schuchter
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Phase I clinical trial of CEP-2563 dihydrochloride, a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with refractory solid tumors.

Authors:  Samir D Undevia; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Ann M Mauer; Linda Janisch; Sridhar Mani; Mark J Ratain
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.850

10.  Clinical benefit in Phase-I trials of novel molecularly targeted agents: does dose matter?

Authors:  S Postel-Vinay; H-T Arkenau; D Olmos; J Ang; J Barriuso; S Ashley; U Banerji; J De-Bono; I Judson; S Kaye
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.