Literature DB >> 2148104

Responses and toxic deaths in phase I clinical trials.

G Decoster1, G Stein, E E Holdener.   

Abstract

This review analysis consists of the antitumor activity and toxic deaths reported in single agent Phase I clinical trials using cytotoxic compounds published from 1972 to 1987. A total of 6639 patients with a variety of solid tumors and hematological malignancies were accrued in 211 trials studying 87 compounds. The median number of patients per trial was 28 (range: 7-111) and the median of the median ages reported in the individual trial was 56 (range of individual age: 2 to 93 years). Ten percent of the trials enrolled pediatric patients (less than 18 years), but the exact numbers of children were not always given or separated from the adult patients. Nine percent of the patients had received no prior treatment, 75% were pretreated either with chemotherapy alone (50%) or radio- plus chemotherapy (25%). Radiotherapy alone was administered to 11% of the patients and the remaining 5% of the patients received prior treatments which was not specified. The most frequent tumor types were those of the gastrointestinal tract (22%) and the respiratory tract (19%). The frequency of the remaining malignancies was less than 10% of all patients. There were 23 (0.3%) complete responders and 279 (4.2%) partial responders for an overall response rate of 4.5% among all entries. Toxic deaths were rare and reported in only 31 patients (0.5% of the entire population). Responses were usually observed in chemosensitive tumor types. Despite a low response rate reported during the first phase of cytotoxic drug development, the present analysis shows that some therapeutic benefit can be achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2148104     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a057716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  36 in total

1.  Communicating about phase I trials: objective disclosures are only a first step.

Authors:  Anne Lederman Flamm; Rebecca D Pentz
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-04-04

Review 2.  Ethical issues in the development of new agents.

Authors:  C K Daugherty
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.850

3.  Practical communication guidance to improve phase 1 informed consent conversations and decision-making in pediatric oncology.

Authors:  Liza-Marie Johnson; Angela C Leek; Dennis Drotar; Robert B Noll; Susan R Rheingold; Eric D Kodish; Justin N Baker
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Therapeutic optimism in the consent forms of phase 1 gene transfer trials: an empirical analysis.

Authors:  J Kimmelman; N Palmour
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Prognostic factors among cancer patients with good performance status screened for phase I trials.

Authors:  Nicolas Penel; Marie Vanseymortier; Marie-Edith Bonneterre; Stéphanie Clisant; Eric Dansin; Yvette Vendel; Régis Beuscart; Jacques Bonneterre
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2007-09-22       Impact factor: 3.850

6.  The myth of equipoise in phase 1 clinical trials.

Authors:  Adil E Shamoo
Journal:  Medscape J Med       Date:  2008-11-05

7.  "Classical 3 + 3 design" versus "accelerated titration designs": analysis of 270 phase 1 trials investigating anti-cancer agents.

Authors:  Nicolas Penel; Nicolas Isambert; Pierre Leblond; Charles Ferte; Alain Duhamel; Jacques Bonneterre
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 3.850

8.  American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: the critical role of phase I trials in cancer research and treatment.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Weber; Laura A Levit; Peter C Adamson; Suanna Bruinooge; Howard A Burris; Michael A Carducci; Adam P Dicker; Mithat Gönen; Stephen M Keefe; Michael A Postow; Michael A Thompson; David M Waterhouse; Susan L Weiner; Lynn M Schuchter
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Phase I oncology studies: evidence that in the era of targeted therapies patients on lower doses do not fare worse.

Authors:  Rajul K Jain; J Jack Lee; David Hong; Maurie Markman; Jing Gong; Aung Naing; Jennifer Wheler; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Characteristics and outcomes of breast cancer patients enrolled in the National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program sponsored phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  Filipa Lynce; Matthew J Blackburn; Ling Cai; Heping Wang; Larry Rubinstein; Pamela Harris; Claudine Isaacs; Paula R Pohlmann
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.