Literature DB >> 7918261

Evaluation of the Humphrey FASTPAC threshold program in glaucoma.

C O'Brien1, D Poinoosawmy, J Wu, R Hitchings.   

Abstract

The makers of the Humphrey perimeter have developed a rapid thresholding program, FASTPAC, to address the problems of fatigue and poor test performance associated with prolonged perimetry. The performance of FASTPAC was compared with the standard threshold program of the Humphrey visual field analyser (program 24-2) in 44 glaucoma patients. FASTPAC reduced the mean test time by 35% (from 12.6 to 8.2 minutes), owing to a reduction in the number of stimulus presentations. FASTPAC underestimated the mean deviation (MD) (Wilcoxon, p = 0.007) and corrected pattern standard deviation (CPSD) (Wilcoxon, p = 0.005). The sum of the differences between FASTPAC and the standard program was -1.19 (SD 2.37) dB for MD and 0.97 (2.14) dB for CPSD. The measured difference between the two methods was independent of the value of either MD or CPSD, indicating that the measurement error was just as likely to occur with either early or advanced visual field loss. No difference was noted in short term fluctuation or in the reliability indices of test performance. These results indicate that FASTPAC, while considerably faster, is not as accurate as the standard threshold program at measuring retinal sensitivity in glaucoma. This inaccuracy may be offset in practical terms by greater patient acceptability and by increasing the number of patients capable of performing reliable threshold perimetry because of the reduction in duration of the FASTPAC program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7918261      PMCID: PMC504854          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.78.7.516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  4 in total

Review 1.  Rational choice of therapy in primary open angle glaucoma.

Authors:  J L Jay
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Optimization of the presentation pattern in automated static perimetry.

Authors:  J Spahr
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Factors that influence the prevalence of positive catch trials in glaucoma patients.

Authors:  M Reynolds; W C Stewart; S Sutherland
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Changes in differential threshold in patients with glaucoma during prolonged perimetry.

Authors:  A Heijl; S M Drance
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 4.638

  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  Comparison of global indices and test duration between two visual field analyzers: Octopus 300 and Topcon SBP-3000.

Authors:  Jose Javier Garcia-Medina; Manuel Garcia-Medina; Vicente Zanon-Moreno; Carlos Garcia-Maturana; Francisco Javier Cruz-Espinosa; Maria Dolores Pinazo-Duran
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Perimetry--back to the future?

Authors:  R A Hitchings
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 3.  Automated perimetry in glaucoma--room for improvement?

Authors:  C O'Brien; J M Wild
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  A novel Bayesian adaptive method for mapping the visual field.

Authors:  Pengjing Xu; Luis Andres Lesmes; Deyue Yu; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.