Literature DB >> 2401419

Factors that influence the prevalence of positive catch trials in glaucoma patients.

M Reynolds1, W C Stewart, S Sutherland.   

Abstract

We evaluated factors that influence the catch-trial response in automated perimetry by consecutively examining 408 glaucoma patients (703 eyes) with either the program 30-2 or a 76-point screen with a quantified defect on the Humphrey Field Analyzer. The prevalence of positive catch trials using both programs was: 15.9% fixation losses, 5.5% false-positives, and 17.0% false-negatives. The only significant difference between the two programs was a lower prevalence of false-negatives on the program 30-2 (P less than 0.01). False-positive responses showed a significant positive correlation to fixation losses, and the catch trial response in general was correlated significantly to defect depth, test time, age, and visual acuity (P less than 0.05). This study suggests that the prevalence of positive catch trials is not an independent variable when testing glaucoma patients with automated perimetry and is not reduced by using a screening strategy over a full-threshold exam.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2401419     DOI: 10.1007/bf00920059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  6 in total

1.  Full threshold versus quantification of defects for visual field testing in glaucoma.

Authors:  W C Stewart; M B Shields; A R Ollie
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Reliability indexes of automated perimetric tests.

Authors:  J Katz; A Sommer
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-09

3.  Recognizing glaucomatous field loss with the Humphrey STATPAC.

Authors:  C Enger; A Sommer
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-10

4.  Changes in differential threshold in patients with glaucoma during prolonged perimetry.

Authors:  A Heijl; S M Drance
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Some aspects of the automation of perimetry.

Authors:  F Frankhauser; J Spahr; H Bebie
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1977 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.048

6.  Assessing the utility of reliability indices for automated visual fields. Testing ocular hypertensives.

Authors:  M Bickler-Bluth; G L Trick; A E Kolker; D G Cooper
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 12.079

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Influence of missed catch trials on the visual field in normal subjects.

Authors:  M A Cascairo; W C Stewart; S E Sutherland
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Influence of missed catch trials on the visual field in normal subjects.

Authors:  F Fankhauser
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Evaluation of the Humphrey FASTPAC threshold program in glaucoma.

Authors:  C O'Brien; D Poinoosawmy; J Wu; R Hitchings
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.638

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.