Literature DB >> 31845976

A novel Bayesian adaptive method for mapping the visual field.

Pengjing Xu1, Luis Andres Lesmes2, Deyue Yu1, Zhong-Lin Lu3,4,5.   

Abstract

Measuring visual functions such as light and contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, reading speed, and crowding across retinal locations provides visual-field maps (VFMs) that are extremely valuable for detecting and managing eye diseases. Although mapping light sensitivity is a standard glaucoma test, the measurement is often noisy (Keltner et al., 2000). Mapping other visual functions is even more challenging. To improve the precision of light-sensitivity mapping and enable other VFM assessments, we developed a novel hybrid Bayesian adaptive testing framework, the qVFM method. The method combines a global module for preliminary assessment of the VFM's shape and a local module for assessing individual visual-field locations. This study validates the qVFM method in measuring light sensitivity across the visual field. In both simulation and psychophysics studies, we sampled 100 visual-field locations (60° × 60°) and compared the performance of qVFM with the qYN procedure (Lesmes et al., 2015) that measured light sensitivity at each location independently. In the simulations, a simulated observer was tested monocularly for 1,000 runs with 1,200 trials/run, to compare the accuracy and precision of the two methods. In the experiments, data were collected from 12 eyes (six left, six right) of six human subjects. Subjects were cued to report the presence or absence of a target stimulus, with the luminance and location of the target adaptively selected in each trial. Both simulations and a psychological experiment showed that the qVFM method can provide accurate, precise, and efficient mapping of light sensitivity. This method can be extended to map other visual functions, with potential clinical signals for monitoring vision loss, evaluating therapeutic interventions, and developing effective rehabilitation for low vision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31845976      PMCID: PMC6917184          DOI: 10.1167/19.14.16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  141 in total

1.  The pattern-pulse multifocal visual evoked potential.

Authors:  Andrew Charles James
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  New perimetric techniques: a comparison between rarebit and frequency doubling technology perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Lene Martin; Peter Wanger
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Correlation of retinal sensitivity measured with fundus-related microperimetry to visual acuity and retinal thickness in eyes with diabetic macular edema.

Authors:  K Okada; S Yamamoto; S Mizunoya; A Hoshino; M Arai; Y Takatsuna
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry.

Authors:  C A Johnson; S J Samuels
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields.

Authors:  A Heijl; A Lindgren; G Lindgren
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-08-15       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Color contrast perimetry.

Authors:  W M Hart; R K Hartz; R W Hagen; K W Clark
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Assessing reading performance in the periphery with a Bayesian adaptive approach: The qReading method.

Authors:  Timothy G Shepard; Fang Hou; Peter J Bex; Luis A Lesmes; Zhong-Lin Lu; Deyue Yu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Evaluation of FASTPAC, a new strategy for threshold estimation with the Humphrey Field Analyzer, in a glaucomatous population.

Authors:  J G Flanagan; J M Wild; G E Trope
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Contrast sensitivity perimetry and clinical measures of glaucomatous damage.

Authors:  William H Swanson; Victor E Malinovsky; Mitchell W Dul; Rizwan Malik; Julie K Torbit; Bradley M Sutton; Douglas G Horner
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.973

View more
  4 in total

1.  Do Impairments in Visual Functions Affect Skiing Performance?

Authors:  Amritha Stalin; Marieke Creese; Kristine Nicole Dalton
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.677

2.  Psychophysical Validation of a Novel Active Learning Approach for Measuring the Visual Acuity Behavioral Function.

Authors:  Yukai Zhao; Luis Andres Lesmes; Michael Dorr; Peter J Bex; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.283

3.  Evaluating the Performance of qVFM in Mapping the Visual Field of Simulated Observers With Eye Diseases.

Authors:  Pengjing Xu; Luis Andres Lesmes; Deyue Yu; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Mapping the Contrast Sensitivity of the Visual Field With Bayesian Adaptive qVFM.

Authors:  Pengjing Xu; Luis A Lesmes; Deyue Yu; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 4.677

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.