Literature DB >> 6871143

Changes in differential threshold in patients with glaucoma during prolonged perimetry.

A Heijl, S M Drance.   

Abstract

Patients with chronic open-angle glaucoma and others suspected of having glaucoma were subjected to continuous contrast threshold measurement by automatic and manual perimetric techniques. The results show that an increase of contrast threshold over time is a frequent finding in glaucoma patients and that this increment can be large, especially at points close to existing field defects. it is reproducible and independent of background illumination and can be demonstrated with both automatic and manual testing, but it is larger in the automatic than in the manual mode of testing. The results may have some important implications for visual field testing in glaucoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6871143      PMCID: PMC1040109          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.67.8.512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  7 in total

1.  An automatic perimeter for glaucoma visual field screening and control. Construction and clinical cases.

Authors:  A Heijl; C E Krakau
Journal:  Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1975-10-17

2.  The effects of blur upon perimetric thresholds. A method for determining a quantitative estimate of retinal contour.

Authors:  F FANKHAUSER; J M ENOCH
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1962-08

3.  A static perimetric technique believed to test receptive field properties: extension and verification of the analysis.

Authors:  J M Enoch; R Berger; R Birns
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1970-12-21       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Further perimetric analysis of patients with lesions of the visual pathways.

Authors:  R N Sunga; J M Enoch
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Variability of glaucomatous visual field defects in computerized perimetry.

Authors:  C Holmin; C E Krakau
Journal:  Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1979-06-15

6.  Quantitative layer-by-layer perimetry.

Authors:  J M Enoch
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Time changes of contrast thresholds during automatic perimetry.

Authors:  A Heijl
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1977-08
  7 in total
  23 in total

1.  Full threshold versus quantification of defects for visual field testing in glaucoma.

Authors:  W C Stewart; M B Shields; A R Ollie
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Comparison of global indices and test duration between two visual field analyzers: Octopus 300 and Topcon SBP-3000.

Authors:  Jose Javier Garcia-Medina; Manuel Garcia-Medina; Vicente Zanon-Moreno; Carlos Garcia-Maturana; Francisco Javier Cruz-Espinosa; Maria Dolores Pinazo-Duran
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Stabilization and comparison of TOP and Bracketing perimetric strategies using a threshold spatial filter.

Authors:  Manuel Gonzalez de la Rosa; Marta Gonzalez-Hernandez; Tinguaro Diaz Aleman; Manuel Sanchez Mendez
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Factors that influence the prevalence of positive catch trials in glaucoma patients.

Authors:  M Reynolds; W C Stewart; S Sutherland
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  The influence of alcohol on the outcome of automated static perimetry.

Authors:  M Zulauf; J Flammer; C Signer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  The interpretation of the differential threshold in the central visual field.

Authors:  J M Wild; J M Wood; J G Flanagan; P A Good; S J Crews
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-02-28       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Evaluation of FASTPAC: a new strategy for threshold estimation with the Humphrey Field Analyser.

Authors:  J G Flanagan; I D Moss; J M Wild; C Hudson; L Prokopich; D Whitaker; E C O'Neill
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 8.  Automated perimetry in glaucoma--room for improvement?

Authors:  C O'Brien; J M Wild
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  New approach to estimating variability in visual field data using an image processing technique.

Authors:  D P Crabb; D F Edgar; F W Fitzke; A I McNaught; H P Wynn
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  The influence of stimulus parameters on the visual field indices by automated projection perimetry.

Authors:  M Dengler-Harles; J M Wild; M D Cole; E C O'Neill
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.