Literature DB >> 7857145

Comparison of manually constructed and stapled anastomoses in colorectal surgery. West of Scotland and Highland Anastomosis Study Group.

J G Docherty1, J R McGregor, A M Akyol, G D Murray, D J Galloway.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors compared both the initial and the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing stapled and sutured colorectal anastomoses. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Sutured and stapled large bowel anastomoses are perceived to be equally safe, but concern has been raised about increased rates of tumor recurrence with the use of stapling instruments.
METHODS: The outcome of patients with sutured and stapled colorectal anastomoses were compared in a prospective, multicenter, randomized study. Factors affecting long-term outcomes were assessed by both univariate and multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: Seven hundred thirty-two patients were recruited. There was a significant increase in radiologic leakage in the sutured group (14.4% vs. 5.2%, p < 0.05), but there was no difference in clinical anastomotic leak rates, morbidity, or postoperative mortality. Tumor recurrence and cancer-specific mortality were higher in the sutured patients (7.5% and 6.7%, respectively) and in patients with anastomotic leaks.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that suturing or stapling are equally safe in large bowel surgery. However, it also shows a long-term benefit of stapling in colorectal cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7857145      PMCID: PMC1234951          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199502000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  28 in total

1.  Local recurrence after low anterior resection using the staple gun.

Authors:  P A Hurst; W G Prout; J M Kelly; J J Bannister; R T Walker
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Randomized prospective evaluation of the EEA stapler for colorectal anastomoses.

Authors:  R W Beart; K A Kelly
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Comparison of stapled and hand-sutured gastrectomies.

Authors:  P H Weil; H Scherz
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1981-01

4.  Prospective controlled study of gastrointestinal stapled anastomoses.

Authors:  R B Reiling; W A Reiling; W A Bernie; A B Huffer; N C Perkins; D W Elliott
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Mechanical suture by Soviet apparatus in gastric resection: use in 4,000 operations.

Authors:  J J Gritsman
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1966-05       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Stapling instruments in upper gastrointestinal surgery: a retrospective study of 362 cases.

Authors:  I M Lowdon; M W Gear; J O Kilby
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Towards fewer colostomies--the impact of circular stapling devices on the surgery of rectal cancer in a district hospital.

Authors:  R J Heald
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  The clinical significance of invasion of veins by rectal cancer.

Authors:  I C Talbot; S Ritchie; M H Leighton; A O Hughes; H J Bussey; B C Morson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Prognostic significance of surgical perforation of the rectum during abdominoperineal resection for rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  K R Ranbarger; W D Johnston; J C Chang
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  The stapled gastrointestinal tract anastomosis: incidence of postoperative complications compared with the sutured anastomosis.

Authors:  J L Chassin; K M Rifkind; B Sussman; B Kassel; A Fingaret; S Drager; P S Chassin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  49 in total

Review 1.  [Minimal invasive therapy of "early" tumors].

Authors:  E Frimberger; H Feussner; H Allescher; T Rösch
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 0.743

2.  Delayed Gastric Emptying After Stapled Versus Hand-Sewn Anastomosis of Duodenojejunostomy in Pylorus-Preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Randomized Controlled trial.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Sakamoto; Shutaro Hori; Seiji Oguro; Junichi Arita; Yoji Kishi; Satoshi Nara; Minoru Esaki; Akio Saiura; Kazuaki Shimada; Takeharu Yamanaka; Tomoo Kosuge
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Risk factors for anastomotic leak and postoperative morbidity and mortality after elective right colectomy for cancer: results from a prospective, multicentric study of 1102 patients.

Authors:  Matteo Frasson; Pablo Granero-Castro; José Luis Ramos Rodríguez; Blas Flor-Lorente; Mariela Braithwaite; Eva Martí Martínez; Jose Antonio Álvarez Pérez; Antonio Codina Cazador; Alejandro Espí; Eduardo Garcia-Granero
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Anastomotic disruption after large bowel resection.

Authors:  Mohammad U Nasirkhan; Farshad Abir; Walter Longo; Robert Kozol
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Intraoperative colonoscopy for the assessment and prevention of anastomotic leakage in low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Seung Yoon Yang; Jeonghee Han; Yoon Dae Han; Min Soo Cho; Hyuk Hur; Kang Young Lee; Nam Kyu Kim; Byung Soh Min
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Comparative Study between Staplers and Conventional(Hand-Sewn) Anastomosis in Gastrointestinal Surgery.

Authors:  Himabindu Bangaru; Rama Mohan Rao Veitla; Mythili Pigilam; Girish Kumar Kunwargiri
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 7.  Influence of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcome in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  In Ja Park
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Manually constructed and stapled anastomoses.

Authors:  K S Woodman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Handsewn versus stapled gastroduodenostomy in patients with gastric cancer: long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Taebong Kim; Wansik Yu; Hoyoung Chung
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Reconstruction techniques after proctectomy: what's the best?

Authors:  Sebastian G de la Fuente; Christopher R Mantyh
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.