Literature DB >> 718296

The stapled gastrointestinal tract anastomosis: incidence of postoperative complications compared with the sutured anastomosis.

J L Chassin, K M Rifkind, B Sussman, B Kassel, A Fingaret, S Drager, P S Chassin.   

Abstract

Performance of gastrointestinal anastomosis by means of surgical stapling devices has achieved popularity in the last decade even though no detailed study has been reported comparing complications following the stapled anastomosis with those following hand sutured procedures performed by the same surgeons. We have reviewed 812 operative procedures on the gastrointestinal tract performed in one hospital over a four year period. Stapled anastomoses were performed in 472 with 13 (2.8%) complications related to the anastomosis; in 296 sutured anastomoses there were nine (3.0%) related complications. Comparison did not disclose any significant difference in the number of complications in these two groups. In 44 instances wherein the anastomosis contained both staples and sutures, there were no related complications. Further analysis of the patients in each group disclosed that stapling procedures were utilized in a much higher percentage of those operations which were performed under emergency conditions or in the presence of intra-abdominal sepsis, intestinal obstruction, and carcinomatosis. If the technical details of surgical stapling are mastered, this technique appears to be as safe as suturing in the performance of anastomoses in the gastrointestinal tract.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 718296      PMCID: PMC1396764          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-197811000-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  11 in total

1.  Automatic staple suturing for gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  R G Latimer; W A Doane; J E McKittrick; A Shepherd
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Mortality and prognosis of obstructing carcinoma of the large bowel.

Authors:  J W Dutton; A Hreno; L G Hampson
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  ASEPTIC TECHNIC OF STOMACH RESECTIONS.

Authors:  A De Petz
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1927-09       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Mechanical suture methods in thoracic and abdominal surgery.

Authors:  W R Lawson; J Hutchison; C J Longland; M A Haque
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Mechanical sutures in surgery.

Authors:  F M Steichen; M M Ravitch
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Factor contributing to leakage of colonic anastomoses.

Authors:  T R Schrock; C W Deveney; J E Dunphy
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Technics of staple suturing in the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  M M Ravitch; F M Steichen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Management of severe obstruction of the large bowel due to malignant disease.

Authors:  J P Welch; G A Donaldson
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Closure of duodenal, gastric and intestinal stumps with wire staples: experimental and clinical studies.

Authors:  M M Ravitch; R Lane; W P Cornell; A Rivarola; T McEnany
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1966-04       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Mechanical suture by Soviet apparatus in gastric resection: use in 4,000 operations.

Authors:  J J Gritsman
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1966-05       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  26 in total

1.  Evaluation of the mechanical strength and patency of functional end-to-end anastomoses.

Authors:  T Goto; K Kawasaki; Y Fujino; K Kanemitsu; T Kamigaki; D Kuroda; Y Suzuki; Y Kuroda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Effects of the time interval between clamping and linear stapling for resection of porcine small intestine.

Authors:  K Morita; N Maeda; T Kawaoka; S Hiraki; A Kudo; S Fukuda; M Oka
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Bowel anastomoses: The theory, the practice and the evidence base.

Authors:  Frances Goulder
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-09-27

4.  The effect of tissue compression on circular stapler line failure.

Authors:  Stephan R Myers; William S Rothermel; Lynn Shaffer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Is "functional end-to-end anastomosis" really functional? A review of the literature on stapled anastomosis using linear staplers.

Authors:  Masayuki Kano; Naoyuki Hanari; Hisashi Gunji; Koichi Hayano; Hideki Hayashi; Hisahiro Matsubara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Intra-operative air testing: an audit on rectal anastomosis.

Authors:  A H Davies; D C Bartolo; A E Richards; C D Johnson; N J McC Mortensen
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  [The blood supply of manually sutured and stapled colonic anastomoses].

Authors:  H Hansen; H J Sommer; W Eichelkraut
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1987

8.  [Roux-Y reconstruction following distal stomach resection using only staplers].

Authors:  A Thiede; K H Fuchs; H J Wirtz; H Hamelmann
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1986

9.  Latero-lateral end anastomosis for right hemicolectomy using staplers.

Authors:  I Yokoyama; T Yoneda; I Ichimura; S Kitagawa; Y Okazaki; H Takagi
Journal:  Jpn J Surg       Date:  1986-11

10.  Ileocolonic anastomosis after right hemicolectomy for carcinoma: stapled or hand-sewn? A prospective, multicenter, randomized trial.

Authors:  M Kracht; J M Hay; P L Fagniez; A Fingerhut
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.