Literature DB >> 7006425

Randomized prospective evaluation of the EEA stapler for colorectal anastomoses.

R W Beart, K A Kelly.   

Abstract

A randomized, prospective study should be done to evaluate any new procedure or instrument. Our experience with the end-to-end anastomosis (EEA) stapler suggests that an anastomosis can be created in a shorter time than is required for the traditional hand-sewn technique. This difference is even greater when the anastomosis is technically difficult and located deep within the pelvis. There appears to be little difference in the security of a hand-sewn anastomosis compared with that of stapled anastomosis. Postoperative complications appear similar. With the stapler, however, there is an increased risk of intraoperative complications that are not apparent with the traditional hand-sewn technique. These include rectal tears and anastomotic defects. It appears that the EEA stapler can save as many as 12 percent of rectums that otherwise might have to be removed because of technical inability to perform an anastomosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7006425     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(81)90027-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  37 in total

Review 1.  Anastomotic disruption after large bowel resection.

Authors:  Mohammad U Nasirkhan; Farshad Abir; Walter Longo; Robert Kozol
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Prevention and management of recurrent rectal cancer.

Authors:  R W Beart
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Short-term outcomes of Roux-en-Y stapled anastomosis after distal gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Takeshi Fujita; Hitoshi Katai; Shinji Morita; Makoto Saka; Takeo Fukagawa; Takeshi Sano
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Sutureless colonic anastomoses.

Authors:  B Zederfeldt; H Jiborn; G Ekelund
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1990

5.  Closure of the urinary bladder with stainless steel and absorbable staples.

Authors:  T B Julian; M M Ravitch
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Predictive factors of stenosis after stapled colorectal anastomosis: prospective analysis of 179 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Guillermo C Bannura; Miguel Angel G Cumsille; Alejandro E Barrera; Jaime P Contreras; Carlos L Melo; Daniel C Soto
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Left-sided colon and colorectal anastomoses: Doppler ultrasound as an aid to assess bowel vascularization. A prospective evaluation of 200 consecutive elective cases.

Authors:  P Ambrosetti; J Robert; P Mathey; A Rohner
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Colorectal anastomotic stricture: is it associated with inadequate colonic mobilization?

Authors:  A Hiranyakas; G Da Silva; P Denoya; S Shawki; S D Wexner
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 9.  Anastomoses of the lower gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Govind Nandakumar; Sharon L Stein; Fabrizio Michelassi
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 46.802

10.  Abdominosacral resection for midrectal cancer. A fifteen-year experience.

Authors:  S A Localio; K Eng; G F Coppa
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.