Literature DB >> 7388345

The clinical significance of invasion of veins by rectal cancer.

I C Talbot, S Ritchie, M H Leighton, A O Hughes, H J Bussey, B C Morson.   

Abstract

A histopathological study of 703 surgical specimens from patients with adenocarcinoma of the rectum revealed invasion of veins by primary growth in almost 52 per cent. Follow-up studies on the patients showed that the corrected 5-year survival rate was significantly worse and liver metastases developed more frequently when venous invasion was present. Invasion of extramural veins was particularly significant whereas spread confined to intramural veins was less important. Invasion of large (thick-walled) veins was of greater consequence than invasion of small (thin-walled) veins and spread into thick-walled extramural veins had the greatest adverse influence of all. Venous spread of tumour takes place in parallel with local spread as measured by the Dukes' stage but exerts an influence on prognosis independent of the Dukes' stage. Similarly, vein invasion parallels the number of lymph node metastases but appears to exert an independent influence on prognosis. Observation of venous spread provides a precise assessment of the likely behaviour of rectal carcinoma and supplements, but does not replace indices such as the Dukes' stage or the number of lymph node metastases in routine use. The implications for surgical technique and management are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7388345     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800670619

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  87 in total

1.  A long hard look at Dukes' B.

Authors:  G T Williams
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Systematic review of prognostic importance of extramural venous invasion in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Manish Chand; Muhammed R S Siddiqui; Ian Swift; Gina Brown
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  The benefits of elastic[corrected]--no stretch of the imagination [corrected].

Authors:  G Smith; N Waddell; A Riley
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Mutually exclusive promoter hypermethylation patterns of hMLH1 and O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Edward J Fox; Dermot T Leahy; Robert Geraghty; Hugh E Mulcahy; David Fennelly; John M Hyland; Diarmuid P O'Donoghue; Kieran Sheahan
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.568

5.  Lymphovascular invasion in colorectal cancer: an interobserver variability study.

Authors:  Elizabeth I Harris; David N Lewin; Hanlin L Wang; Gregory Y Lauwers; Amitabh Srivastava; Yu Shyr; Bashar Shakhtour; Frank Revetta; Mary K Washington
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.394

6.  Prognostic value of additional pathological variables for long-term survival after curative resection of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Bojan Krebs; Miran Kozelj; Rajko Kavalar; Borut Gajzer; Eldar M Gadzijev
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  How Should Imaging Direct/Orient Management of Rectal Cancer?

Authors:  Jemma Bhoday; Svetlana Balyasnikova; Anita Wale; Gina Brown
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-11-27

8.  Venous invasion as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A Tsuchiya; Y Ando; Y Kikuchi; M Kanazawa; H Sato; R Abe
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Rectal cancer staging.

Authors:  James S Wu
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08

10.  The pathologist's role in rectal cancer patient assessments.

Authors:  Joseph E Willis
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.