Literature DB >> 7058986

Prognostic significance of surgical perforation of the rectum during abdominoperineal resection for rectal carcinoma.

K R Ranbarger, W D Johnston, J C Chang.   

Abstract

Two hundred fifty patients were followed up after resection for carcinoma of the rectum. Sixty-four (25.6 percent) had a surgical perforation in the resected rectum. Perforation did not affect the long term outcome in patients with Dukes' A or D tumors, but in patients with Dukes' B and C cancers the surgical defect was associated with an increased incidence of recurrent tumor (57 versus 34 percent) and a decreased 5 year survival rate (31 versus 46 percent). The local recurrence rate was significantly higher in patients with Dukes' B rectal cancer who had an iatrogenic perforation (25.9 percent) than in those without a perforation (8.1 percent). This increased local recurrence rate was as high as the local recurrence rate in patients with Dukes' C cancers (23 percent) with or without a perforation. Patients with Dukes' B or C cancers who had incomplete resection had survival patterns similar to those in patients with Dukes' D cancers. Failure to remove all gross tumor and failure to avoid rectal perforation during abdominoperineal resection increases the risk of recurrence and decreases the chance of long-term survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7058986     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(82)90063-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  9 in total

1.  Oncological outcome after incidental perforation in radical rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Fredrik Jörgren; Robert Johansson; Lena Damber; Gudrun Lindmark
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Pre- or postoperative radiotherapy in rectal and rectosigmoid carcinoma. Report from a randomized multicenter trial.

Authors:  L Påhlman; B Glimelius
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Need for immunologic stimulators during immunosuppression produced by major cancer surgery.

Authors:  W H Cole; L Humphrey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Analysis of local recurrence rates after surgery alone for rectal cancer.

Authors:  J L McCall; M R Cox; D A Wattchow
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Short-term outcome of extra-levator abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Sigmar Stelzner; Gunter Hellmich; Clemens Schubert; Erik Puffer; Gunter Haroske; Helmut Witzigmann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Is ascites CEA a risk factor for peritoneal carcinomatosis in colorectal cancer?: a long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Byung Chul Kim; Jung Hoon Bae; Sun Min Park; Dae Youn Won; In Kyu Lee
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  [Intra-operative local tumor cell dissemination in rectal carcinoma surgery: effect of operation principles and neoadjuvant therapy].

Authors:  S Merkel; W Hohenberger; P Hermanek
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Anastomotic leaks in colorectal cancer surgery: a risk factor for recurrence?

Authors:  A M Akyol; J R McGregor; D J Galloway; G D Murray; W D George
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Comparison of manually constructed and stapled anastomoses in colorectal surgery. West of Scotland and Highland Anastomosis Study Group.

Authors:  J G Docherty; J R McGregor; A M Akyol; G D Murray; D J Galloway
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 12.969

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.