Literature DB >> 7846916

Selective use of ERCP in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

R Rieger1, H Sulzbacher, R Woisetschläger, P Schrenk, W Wayand.   

Abstract

With the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCH) various strategies have been proposed for the management of common bile duct (CBD) stones. In a consecutive series of 1140 patients subjected to LCH, preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was attempted in 128 patients (11.2%) and successfully accomplished in 121 (94.5%). Based on the prediction of CBD stones by laboratory tests, ultrasonography, and intravenous cholangiography, prelaparoscopic ERCP was performed in 106 patients (9.3%). CBD stones were identified in 56 patients and benign papillary stenosis in 5 patients (57.5%). Of these 61 patients, 58 (95%) were treated by endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) and stone extraction followed by LCH after a mean interval of 1.6 days. Three patients with failure of endoscopic ductal stone extraction required open CBD exploration. In 39 of the 106 patients (36.8%) ERCP was negative for ductal stones but revealed unexpected ampullary and pancreatic cancer in two cases. Six patients (of the 106) with preoperative ERCP cannulation failure (5.7%) were managed either by LCH and intraoperative cholangiography or by open CBD exploration. In 22 of the 1140 total patients (1.9%) ERCP was performed at various intervals after LCH. Retained CBD stones were found in eight patients, and ES and ductal clearance was achieved in all eight. There was no mortality among the entire surgical group who underwent perioperative ERCP/ES. Including two cases of ES-related pancreatitis, the overall morbidity was 5.5% (7 of 128). Perioperative ERCP/ES in conjunction with LCH is an attractive approach for patients with cholecystocholedocholithiasis, at least until laparoscopic ductal clearance becomes a standard procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7846916     DOI: 10.1007/bf00299101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  20 in total

1.  Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  J L Ponsky
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Choledocholithiasis. Endoscopic sphincterotomy or common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  S C Stain; H Cohen; M Tsuishoysha; A J Donovan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Laparoscopic approach to common duct pathology.

Authors:  J B Petelin
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-03

4.  Combined endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with choledocholithiasis and cholecystolithiasis.

Authors:  G Aliperti; S A Edmundowicz; N J Soper; S W Ashley
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-11-15       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 5.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the common bile duct.

Authors:  G McEntee; P A Grace; D Bouchier-Hayes
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Biliary lithiasis: combined endoscopic and surgical treatment.

Authors:  T Ponchon; R Bory; A Chavaillon; P Fouillet
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  Current status of endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Authors:  S E Silvis
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and choledochoscopy for the treatment of cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  P C Smith; R V Clayman; N J Soper
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the state of the art. A report on 700 consecutive cases.

Authors:  J Périssat; D Collet; R Belliard; J Desplantez; E Magne
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Endoscopic treatment of biliary-tract diseases. An international study.

Authors:  L Safrany
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-11-04       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  7 in total

1.  A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited.

Authors:  Chris Collins; Donal Maguire; Adrian Ireland; Edward Fitzgerald; Gerald C O'Sullivan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  EAES ductal stone study.

Authors:  P Sungler; O Boeckl
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Suspected biliary complications after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy leading to endoscopic cholangiography: a retrospective comparison.

Authors:  C F Gholson; C Dungan; G Neff; R Ferguson; D Favrot; I Nandy; P Banish; K Sittig
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.

Authors:  Bobby V M Dasari; Chuan Jin Tan; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; David J Martin; Gareth Kirk; Lloyd McKie; Tom Diamond; Mark A Taylor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-12-12

5.  Selection criteria for preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy and endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones: results of a retrospective, single center study between 1996-2002.

Authors:  Laszlo Lakatos; Gabor Mester; Gyorgy Reti; Attila Nagy; Peter Laszlo Lakatos
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Endosonography with linear array instead of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography as the diagnostic tool in patients with moderate suspicion of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Maciej Kohut; Andrzej Nowak; Ewa Nowakowska-Dulawa; Tomasz Marek; Roman Kaczor
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Indications for selective intraoperative cholangiography.

Authors:  Edward H Livingston; Jordan A G Miller; Brian Coan; Robert V Rege
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.267

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.