Literature DB >> 2039294

Choledocholithiasis. Endoscopic sphincterotomy or common bile duct exploration.

S C Stain1, H Cohen, M Tsuishoysha, A J Donovan.   

Abstract

A prospective randomized trial was conducted of preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and surgery (ES&S) or surgery alone (SA) in 52 patients with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis that were candidates for elective surgery. After ES&S 65% of patients were stone free. Eighty-eight per cent of patients with SA were stone free after surgery (p less than 0.05). Three patients in each group had residual stones at the completion of the operation. Five of these six had more than 20 common bile duct (CBD) stones. There was one episode of major hemorrhage in a patient in each group and no deaths. Costs were essentially equal for the individual patient with a successful ES as compared to SA. Societal costs of a program of preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and ES would be higher because of the cost of screening for patients with CBD stones. These results do not support preoperative ES as a technique for clearance of the CBD of stones on the basis of efficacy, morbidity rate, or cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2039294      PMCID: PMC1358591          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199106000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  29 in total

1.  Complications of nonoperative extraction of retained common duct stones.

Authors:  H J Burhenne
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Threat or opportunity?

Authors:  R K Tompkins
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1990-10

3.  [Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the papilla of vater and extraction of stones from the choledochal duct (author's transl)].

Authors:  M Classen; L Demling
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1974-03-15       Impact factor: 0.628

4.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the ampulla of Vater.

Authors:  K Kawai; Y Akasaka; K Murakami; M Tada; Y Koli
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Retained calculi within the biliary ductal system.

Authors:  F Glenn
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Management of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  L W Way; W H Admirand; J E Dunphy
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Carl Langenbuch and the first cholecystectomy.

Authors:  L W Traverso
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  The incidence and causes of death following surgery for nonmalignant biliary tract disease.

Authors:  C K McSherry; F Glenn
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  The value of choledochoscopy in exploration of the common bile duct.

Authors:  D V Feliciano; K L Mattox; G L Jordan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Endoscopic lithotripsy in the common bile duct.

Authors:  H Koch; W Rösch; V Walz
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  35 in total

1.  Common bile duct stone characteristics: correlation with treatment choice during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  R A Duensing; R A Williams; J C Collins; S E Wilson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Bile duct stones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  D Scott-Coombes; J N Thompson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-01-25

3.  National analysis of in-hospital resource utilization in choledocholithiasis management using propensity scores.

Authors:  B K Poulose; P G Arbogast; M D Holzman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Cost-effective treatment of patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis and possible common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Lisa M Brown; Stanley J Rogers; John P Cello; Karen J Brasel; John M Inadomi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 5.  Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.

Authors:  Bobby V M Dasari; Chuan Jin Tan; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; David J Martin; Gareth Kirk; Lloyd McKie; Tom Diamond; Mark A Taylor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-12-12

6.  Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  Marc Zerey; Stephen Haggerty; William Richardson; Byron Santos; Robert Fanelli; L Michael Brunt; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic trans-cystic-duct common-bile-duct exploration.

Authors:  E H Phillips; R J Rosenthal; B J Carroll; M J Fallas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Cholecystectomy. Which procedure is best for the high-risk patient?

Authors:  C M Wittgen; J P Andrus; C H Andrus; D L Kaminski
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  'Single-Sitting' Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Endoscopic Removal of Common Bile Duct Stone for Cholelithiasis and Choledocholithiasis: a Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Md Ibrarullah; Tapas Mishra; Ambika P Dash; Devanand Mohapatra; M S Modi
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 0.656

10.  Effect of medical or surgical admission on outcome of patients with gallstone pancreatitis and common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Jennifer LaFemina; Suzanne M Sokal; Yuchiao Chang; Deborah McGrath; David L Berger
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.