Literature DB >> 12632530

Endosonography with linear array instead of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography as the diagnostic tool in patients with moderate suspicion of common bile duct stones.

Maciej Kohut1, Andrzej Nowak, Ewa Nowakowska-Dulawa, Tomasz Marek, Roman Kaczor.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) as the main imaging modality in patients with moderate suspicion of common bile duct stones (CBDS).
METHODS: 55 patients with moderate clinical suspicion of CBDS were prospectively included to the study and evaluated with EUS. This study was done in single blind method in the clinical and biochemical data of patients. EUS was done with echo-endoscope Pentax FG 32-UA (f=5-7.5 MHz) and Hitachi EUB 405 ultrasound machine. Patients diagnosed with CBDS by EUS were excluded from this study and treated with ERC. All the other patients were included to the follow up study obtained by mail every 6 months for clinical evaluation (need of ERC or surgery).
RESULTS: CBDS was found in 4 patients by EUS. Diagnosis was confirmed in all cases on ERC. The remaining 51 patients without CBDS on EUS were followed up for 6-26 months (meanly 13 months) There were: 40 women, 42 cholecystectomized patients, aged: 55 (mean). Biochemical values (mean values) were as follows: bilirubin: 14.9 micromol/L, alkaline phosphatase: 95 IU/L(-1), gamma-GTP: 131 IU/L(-1), ALT: 50 IU/L(-1), AST: 49 IU/L(-1)(-1). Only 1 patient was lost for follow up. In the remaining 50 patients with follow up, there was only 1 (2 %) patient with persistent biliary symptoms in whom CBDS was finally diagnosed by ERC with ES. All other patients remained symptoms free on follow up and did not require ERC or biliary surgery.
CONCLUSION: Vast majority of patients with moderate suspicion of CBDS and no stones on EUS with linear array can avoid invasive evaluation of biliary tree with ERC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12632530      PMCID: PMC4621594          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i3.612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  20 in total

1.  Helical computed tomographic cholangiography versus endosonography for suspected bile duct stones: a prospective blinded study in non-jaundiced patients.

Authors:  M Polkowski; J Palucki; J Regula; A Tilszer; E Butruk
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: EUS or magnetic resonance cholangiography? A prospective controlled study.

Authors:  V de Lédinghen; R Lecesne; J M Raymond; V Gense; M Amouretti; J Drouillard; P Couzigou; C Silvain
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  E Deslandres; M Gagner; A Pomp; M Rheault; R Leduc; R Clermont; J Gratton; E J Bernard
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 4.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P B Cotton
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Selective use of ERCP in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  R Rieger; H Sulzbacher; R Woisetschläger; P Schrenk; W Wayand
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Which test for common bile duct stones? Endoscopic and intraductal ultrasonography.

Authors:  L Palazzo
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 7.  Role of open choledochotomy in the treatment of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  H A Pitt
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Endoscopic ultrasonography versus cholangiography for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  M I Canto; A Chak; T Stellato; M V Sivak
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Management of common bile duct stones in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  R E Miller; F M Kimmelstiel; W P Winkler
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Prospective controlled study of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspected common-bileduct lithiasis.

Authors:  F Prat; G Amouyal; P Amouyal; G Pelletier; J Fritsch; A D Choury; C Buffet; J P Etienne
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-01-13       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  8 in total

1.  Endoscopic Ultrasonograpy for Choledocholithiasis and Biliary Malignancy.

Authors:  Bhavani Moparty; Manoop S Bhutani
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-04

2.  Selection criteria for preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy and endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones: results of a retrospective, single center study between 1996-2002.

Authors:  Laszlo Lakatos; Gabor Mester; Gyorgy Reti; Attila Nagy; Peter Laszlo Lakatos
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Vanja Giljaca; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

4.  Twenty years after Erich Muhe: Persisting controversies with the gold standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Kalpesh Jani; P S Rajan; K Sendhilkumar; C Palanivelu
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.407

5.  Endoscopic Ultrasonography Can Prevent Unnecessary Diagnostic Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Even in Patients with High Likelihood of Choledocholithiasis and Inconclusive Ultrasonography: Results of a Prospective Study.

Authors:  Ruchir Patel; Meghraj Ingle; Dhaval Choksi; Prateik Poddar; Vikas Pandey; Prabha Sawant
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2017-08-09

Review 6.  What should be known prior to performing EUS exams? (Part II).

Authors:  Christoph F Dietrich; Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono; Barbara Braden; Sean Burmeister; Silvia Carrara; Xinwu Cui; Milena Di Leo; Yi Dong; Pietro Fusaroli; Uwe Gottschalk; Andrew J Healey; Michael Hocke; Stephan Hollerbach; Julio Iglesias Garcia; André Ignee; Christian Jürgensen; Michel Kahaleh; Masayuki Kitano; Rastislav Kunda; Alberto Larghi; Kathleen Möller; Bertrand Napoleon; Kofi W Oppong; Maria Chiara Petrone; Adrian Saftoiu; Rajesh Puri; Anand V Sahai; Erwin Santo; Malay Sharma; Assaad Soweid; Siyu Sun; Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh; Peter Vilmann; Hans Seifert; Christian Jenssen
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.628

7.  Linear echoendoscope-guided ERCP for the diagnosis of occult common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Hoi-Hung Chan; E-Ming Wang; Meng-Shun Sun; Ping-I Hsu; Wei-Lun Tsai; Tzung-Jiun Tsai; Kai-Ming Wang; Wen-Chi Chen; Huay-Min Wang; Huei-Lung Liang; Kwok-Hung Lai; William Robert Brugge
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Diagnostic Value of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in Symptomatic Patients with High and Intermediate Probabilities of Common Bile Duct Stones and a Negative Computed Tomography Scan.

Authors:  Tae Joo Jeon; Jae Hee Cho; Yeon Suk Kim; Si Young Song; Ji Young Park
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.519

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.