Literature DB >> 15526372

Selection criteria for preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy and endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones: results of a retrospective, single center study between 1996-2002.

Laszlo Lakatos1, Gabor Mester, Gyorgy Reti, Attila Nagy, Peter Laszlo Lakatos.   

Abstract

AIM: The optimal treatment for bile duct stones (in terms of cost, complications and accuracy) is unclear. The aim of our study was to determine the predictive factors for preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
METHODS: Patients undergoing preoperative ERCP (< or =90 d before laparoscopic cholecystectomy) were evaluated in this retrospective study from the 1st of January 1996 to the 31st of December 2002. The indications for ERCP were elevated serum bilirubin, elevated liver function tests (LFT), dilated bile duct (> or =8 mm) and/or stone at US examination, coexisting acute pancreatitis and/or acute pancreatitis or jaundice in patient's history. Suspected prognostic factors and the combination of factors were compared to the result of ERCP.
RESULTS: Two hundred and six preoperative ERCPs were performed during the observed period. The rate of successful cannulation for ERC was (97.1%). Bile duct stones were detected in 81 patients (39.3%), and successfully removed in 79 (97.5%). The number of prognostic factors correlated with the presence of bile duct stones. The positive predictive value for one prognostic factor was 1.2%, for two 43%, for three 72.5%, for four or more 91.4%.
CONCLUSION: Based on our data preoperative ERCP is highly recommended in patients with three or more positive factors (high risk patients). In contrast, ERCP is not indicated in patients with zero or one factor (low risk patients). Preoperative ERCP should be offered to patients with two positive factors (moderate risk patients), however the practice should also be based on the local conditions (e.g. skill of the endoscopist, other diagnostic tools).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15526372      PMCID: PMC4576234          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i23.3495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  31 in total

1.  Cost-effective management of common bile duct stones: a decision analysis of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), intraoperative cholangiography, and laparoscopic bile duct exploration.

Authors:  D R Urbach; Y S Khajanchee; B A Jobe; B A Standage; P D Hansen; L L Swanstrom
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  An annotated algorithm for the evaluation of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  G M Eisen; J A Dominitz; D O Faigel; J L Goldstein; A N Kalloo; B T Petersen; H M Raddawi; M E Ryan; J J Vargo; H S Young; R D Fanelli; N H Hyman; J Wheeler-Harbaugh
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis: 10-year experience.

Authors:  Leopoldo Sarli; Domenico R Iusco; Luigi Roncoroni
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to remove common bile duct stones during routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not prolong hospitalization: a 2-year experience.

Authors:  L Enochsson; B Lindberg; F Swahn; U Arnelo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Bile duct stones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a decision analysis to assess the roles of intraoperative cholangiography, EUS, and ERCP.

Authors:  A V Sahai; P D Mauldin; V Marsi; R H Hawes; B J Hoffman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

Authors:  R E Hintze; A Adler; W Veltzke; H Abou-Rebyeh; R Hammerstingl; T Vogl; R Felix
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  M Rhodes; L Sussman; L Cohen; M P Lewis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-01-17       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Selective use of ERCP in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  R Rieger; H Sulzbacher; R Woisetschläger; P Schrenk; W Wayand
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Selective endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and preoperative bile duct stone removal in patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective study.

Authors:  L Santucci; G Natalini; L Sarpi; S Fiorucci; A Solinas; A Morelli
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Selective cholangiography in 600 patients undergoing cholecystectomy with 5-year follow-up for residual bile duct stones.

Authors:  H Charfare; S Cheslyn-Curtis
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.891

View more
  7 in total

1.  SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery.

Authors:  D Wayne Overby; Keith N Apelgren; William Richardson; Robert Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Management of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Eric S Hungness; Nathaniel J Soper
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Transcystic or transductal stone extraction during single-stage treatment of choledochocystolithiasis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jan Siert K Reinders; Dirk J Gouma; Dirk T Ubbink; Bert van Ramshorst; Djamila Boerma
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Ultrasound versus liver function tests for diagnosis of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Vanja Giljaca; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

5.  Twenty years after Erich Muhe: Persisting controversies with the gold standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Kalpesh Jani; P S Rajan; K Sendhilkumar; C Palanivelu
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.407

6.  Triple non-invasive diagnostic test for exclusion of common bile ducts stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Bahram Pourseidi; Amir Khorram-Manesh
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Review of the Endoscopic, Surgical and Radiological Techniques of Treating Choledocholithiasis in Bariatric Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Patients and Proposed Management Algorithm.

Authors:  Qiuye Cheng; Amy Hort; Peter Yoon; Ken Loi
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 3.479

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.