Literature DB >> 19288090

On-line corrections for visuomotor errors.

Britne A Shabbott1, Robert L Sainburg.   

Abstract

This study was designed to determine how visual feedback mediates error corrections during reaching. We used visuomotor rotations to dissociate a cursor, representing finger position, from the actual finger location. We then extinguished cursor feedback at different distances from the start location to determine whether corrections were based on error extrapolation from prior cursor information. Results indicated that correction amplitude varied with the extent of cursor feedback. A second experiment tested specific aspects of error information that might mediate corrections to visuomotor rotations: rotation angle, distance between the finger and cursor positions and the duration of cursor exposure. Results showed that corrections did not depend on the amplitude of the rotation angle or the amount of time the cursor was shown. Instead, participants corrected for the cursor-finger distance, at the point where cursor feedback was last-seen. These findings suggest that within-trial corrections and inter-trial adaptation might employ different mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19288090      PMCID: PMC3697082          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1749-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  62 in total

1.  Patterns of regional brain activation associated with different forms of motor learning.

Authors:  M Ghilardi; C Ghez; V Dhawan; J Moeller; M Mentis; T Nakamura; A Antonini; D Eidelberg
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2000-07-14       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  On-line trajectory modifications of planar, goal-directed arm movements.

Authors:  Evert-Jan Nijhof
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.161

3.  Error processing in pointing at randomly feedback-induced double-step stimuli.

Authors:  E Komilis; D Pélisson; C Prablanc
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  The effect of target modality on visual and proprioceptive contributions to the control of movement distance.

Authors:  Fabrice R Sarlegna; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Purkinje cell activity during motor learning.

Authors:  P F Gilbert; W T Thach
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1977-06-10       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  PET study of pointing with visual feedback of moving hands.

Authors:  K Inoue; R Kawashima; K Satoh; S Kinomura; R Goto; M Koyama; M Sugiura; M Ito; H Fukuda
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Processing visual feedback information for movement control.

Authors:  L G Carlton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Impairments of reaching movements in patients without proprioception. I. Spatial errors.

Authors:  J Gordon; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  The effect of viewing the static hand prior to movement onset on pointing kinematics and variability.

Authors:  Y Rossetti; G Stelmach; M Desmurget; C Prablanc; M Jeannerod
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The contribution of visual feedback to visuomotor adaptation: how much and when?

Authors:  Mark R Hinder; James R Tresilian; Stephan Riek; Richard G Carson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  12 in total

1.  Hemispheric specialization for movement control produces dissociable differences in online corrections after stroke.

Authors:  Sydney Y Schaefer; Pratik K Mutha; Kathleen Y Haaland; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Postural configuration does not alter unperturbed or perturbed reach movement kinematics.

Authors:  Silvia Hua; Julia A Leonard; Alicia J Hilderley; Paul J Stapley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Frontal and parietal cortex contributions to action modification.

Authors:  Pratik K Mutha; Lee H Stapp; Robert L Sainburg; Kathleen Y Haaland
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Dynamic dominance varies with handedness: reduced interlimb asymmetries in left-handers.

Authors:  Andrzej Przybyla; David C Good; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Visuomotor discordance in virtual reality: effects on online motor control.

Authors:  Hamid F Bagce; Soha Saleh; Sergei V Adamovich; Eugene Tunik
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2011

6.  Trunk muscles contribute as functional groups to directionality of reaching during stance.

Authors:  Alexander Stamenkovic; Paul J Stapley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Dissociation of initial trajectory and final position errors during visuomotor adaptation following unilateral stroke.

Authors:  Sydney Y Schaefer; Kathleen Y Haaland; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Evidence for constancy in the modularity of trunk muscle activity preceding reaching: implications for the role of preparatory postural activity.

Authors:  Alexander Stamenkovic; Lena H Ting; Paul J Stapley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Transitions between discrete and rhythmic primitives in a unimanual task.

Authors:  Dagmar Sternad; Hamal Marino; Steven K Charles; Marcos Duarte; Laura Dipietro; Neville Hogan
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  Fast and fine-tuned corrections when the target of a hand movement is displaced.

Authors:  Leonie Oostwoud Wijdenes; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.