Literature DB >> 1301369

Does limb proprioception drift?

J P Wann1, S F Ibrahim.   

Abstract

The hypothesis that proprioceptively perceived limb position drifts during visual occlusion was re-examined by combining some of the protocols used in previous experiments. Sixteen adult subjects made judgements of static limb position during visual occlusion lasting up to 2 min. In addition, the effect of brief 250 ms "glimpses" of the limb, occasional proprioceptive stimulation and directed attention were examined. Despite, conflicting evidence from earlier experiments, there was clear evidence of a drift in perceived limb position, towards the body, during visual occlusion. This drift was halted if brief glimpses of the limb were provided, or minor re-positioning (without vision) was allowed. In neither case, however, did the supplementary cues reset limb position to its originally perceived position. Drift was amplified when subjects attempted to attend to limb position rather than perform a secondary tracking task. The results are not easily accounted for if drift is considered purely as an effect of peripheral sensor adaptation. A notion of central-drift between visual and proprioceptive maps is suggested as an alternative hypothesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1301369     DOI: 10.1007/bf00230024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  8 in total

1.  KINESTHETIC FIGURAL AFTEREFFECTS: SATIATION OR CONTRAST.

Authors:  J J MOYLAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1964-01

2.  Absolute error revisited: an accuracy indicator in disguise.

Authors:  J A Spray
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 1.328

Review 3.  Representation of egocentric space in the posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  J F Stein
Journal:  Q J Exp Physiol       Date:  1989-09

4.  A back-propagation programmed network that simulates response properties of a subset of posterior parietal neurons.

Authors:  D Zipser; R A Andersen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-02-25       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Accuracy in horizontal arm positioning.

Authors:  P D Rey; J Lichter
Journal:  Res Q       Date:  1971-05

6.  Optimal response of eye and hand motor systems in pointing at a visual target. II. Static and dynamic visual cues in the control of hand movement.

Authors:  C Prablanc; J E Echallier; M Jeannerod; E Komilis
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  The integration of sensory information in the development of precise manual pointing.

Authors:  C von Hofsten; B Rösblad
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Behavioral enhancement of visual responses in monkey cerebral cortex. I. Modulation in posterior parietal cortex related to selective visual attention.

Authors:  M C Bushnell; M E Goldberg; D L Robinson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 2.714

  8 in total
  81 in total

1.  Movement speed effects on limb position drift.

Authors:  Liana E Brown; David A Rosenbaum; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  How perceived egocentric distance varies with changes in tonic vergence.

Authors:  Anne-Emmanuelle Priot; Pascaline Neveu; Olivier Sillan; Justin Plantier; Corinne Roumes; Claude Prablanc
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Multiple frames of reference for pointing to a remembered target.

Authors:  Martin Lemay; George E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Visual afferent information dominates other sources of afferent information during mixed practice of a video-aiming task.

Authors:  Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The impact of whole-hand vibration exposure on the sense of angular position about the wrist joint.

Authors:  Sasa Radovanovic; Scott Jason Day; Håkan Johansson
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 3.015

6.  Why does the brain predict sensory consequences of oculomotor commands? Optimal integration of the predicted and the actual sensory feedback.

Authors:  Siavash Vaziri; Jörn Diedrichsen; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Sensory integration does not lead to sensory calibration.

Authors:  Jeroen B J Smeets; John J van den Dobbelsteen; Denise D J de Grave; Robert J van Beers; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Effects of visual stimuli on temporal order judgments of unimanual finger stimuli.

Authors:  Satoshi Shibuya; Toshimitsu Takahashi; Shigeru Kitazawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Development of kinesthetic-motor and auditory-motor representations in school-aged children.

Authors:  Florian A Kagerer; Jane E Clark
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Effects of visual information on perceived posture of an experimental phantom foot.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Inui; Junya Masumoto
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.