Literature DB >> 33024611

Image Quality and Radiation Dose for Fibrofatty Breast using Target/filter Combinations in Two Digital Mammography Systems.

Khaled Alkhalifah1, Akram Asbeutah1, Ajit Brindhaban1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the optimum combinations of target and filter materials for various X-ray tube voltage settings, as well as their effects on image quality and radiation dose. This was done using different digital mammography (DM) imaging systems with a breast equivalent phantom.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two DM units with a tungsten (W) target, silver (Ag), and rhodium (Rh) filters and dual molybdenum (Mo) and Rh targets/filters were used. A tissue-equivalent mammography phantom of 6 cm thickness equivalent to a fibrofatty breast was exposed 20 times to different target/filter material combinations (W/Rh, W/Ag, Rh/Rh, Mo/Rh, and Mo/Mo) and various kV settings (28-34 kV). The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated for each exposure.
RESULTS: The W/Ag combination resulted in the lowest entrance skin dose and mean glandular dose (MGD). The MGD for the W/Rh combination was 60% less than that of the W/Ag combination at 34 kV (P < 0.05). There was a direct relationship in the SNR with the Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh, and Rh/Rh combinations and an inverse relationship with the CNR in the 34 kV range. There were statistically significant differences between all five target/filter combinations, and the best SNR and CNR were observed for the W/Rh combination with a reduced radiation dose in the range of 28-30 kV (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: For a breast thicknesses of 6 cm with a fibrofatty nature, the W/Rh combination delivers high performance in terms of image quality at a lower dose.
© 2020 Published by Scientific Scholar on behalf of Journal of Clinical Imaging Science.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contrast-to-noise ratio; Digital mammography; Exposure factors; Mammography phantom; Signal-to-noise ratio; Target/filter combination

Year:  2020        PMID: 33024611      PMCID: PMC7533093          DOI: 10.25259/JCIS_30_2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci        ISSN: 2156-5597


  18 in total

1.  Experimental investigation on the choice of the tungsten/rhodium anode/filter combination for an amorphous selenium-based digital mammography system.

Authors:  Paula Toroi; Federica Zanca; Kenneth C Young; Chantal van Ongeval; Guy Marchal; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Effect of dose reduction on the detection of mammographic lesions: a mathematical observer model analysis.

Authors:  Amarpreet S Chawla; Ehsan Samei; Robert Saunders; Craig Abbey; David Delong
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Optimization of exposure parameters in full field digital mammography.

Authors:  Mark B Williams; Priya Raghunathan; Mitali J More; J Anthony Seibert; Alexander Kwan; Joseph Y Lo; Ehsan Samei; Nicole T Ranger; Laurie L Fajardo; Allen McGruder; Sandra M McGruder; Andrew D A Maidment; Martin J Yaffe; Aili Bloomquist; Gordon E Mawdsley
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Investigation of the effect of anode/filter materials on the dose and image quality of a digital mammography system based on an amorphous selenium flat panel detector.

Authors:  P Baldelli; N Phelan; G Egan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Investigation of Exposure Factors for Various Breast Composition and Thicknesses in Digital Screening Mammography Related to Breast Dose.

Authors:  Khaled Alkhalifah; Ajit Brindhaban
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 1.927

6.  A model for optimization of spectral shape in digital mammography.

Authors:  R Fahrig; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Physical characterization of a prototype selenium-based full field digital mammography detector.

Authors:  Robert S Saunders; Ehsan Samei; Jonathan L Jesneck; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Optimal beam quality selection based on contrast-to-noise ratio and mean glandular dose in digital mammography.

Authors:  M Aminah; K H Ng; B J J Abdullah; N Jamal
Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 1.430

9.  Effect of image quality on calcification detection in digital mammography.

Authors:  Lucy M Warren; Alistair Mackenzie; Julie Cooke; Rosalind M Given-Wilson; Matthew G Wallis; Dev P Chakraborty; David R Dance; Hilde Bosmans; Kenneth C Young
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Evaluation of Doses and Image Quality in Mammography with Screen-Film, CR, and DR Detectors - Application of the ACR Phantom.

Authors:  Wioletta Ślusarczyk-Kacprzyk; Witold Skrzyński; Ewa Fabiszewska
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2016-08-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.