Literature DB >> 7828831

Comparative mapping of Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica oleracea chromosomes reveals islands of conserved organization.

S P Kowalski1, T H Lan, K A Feldmann, A H Paterson.   

Abstract

The chromosomes of Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica oleracea have been extensively rearranged since the divergence of these species; however, conserved regions are evident. Eleven regions of conserved organization were detected, ranging from 3.7 to 49.6 cM in A. thaliana, spanning 158.2 cM (24.6%) of the A. thaliana genome, and 245 cM (29.9%) of the B. oleracea genome. At least 17 translocations and 9 inversions distinguish the genomes of A. thaliana and B. oleracea. In one case B. oleracea homoeologs show a common marker order, which is distinguished from the A. thaliana order by a rearrangement, indicating that the lineages of A. thaliana and B. oleracea diverged prior to chromosomal duplication in the Brassica lineage (for at least this chromosome). Some chromosomal segments in B. oleracea appear to be triplicated, indicating the need for reevaluation of a classical model for Brassica chromosome evolution by duplication. The distribution of duplicated loci mapped for about 13% of the DNA probes studied in A. thaliana suggests that ancient duplications may also have occurred in Arabidopsis. The degree of chromosomal divergence between A. thaliana and B. oleracea appears greater than that found in other confamilial species for which comparative maps are available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7828831      PMCID: PMC1206166     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  15 in total

1.  High density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes.

Authors:  S D Tanksley; M W Ganal; J P Prince; M C de Vicente; M W Bonierbale; P Broun; T M Fulton; J J Giovannoni; S Grandillo; G B Martin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Maps of linkage and synteny homologies between mouse and man.

Authors:  J H Nadeau
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  The significance of responses of the genome to challenge.

Authors:  B McClintock
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-11-16       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Chromosomal variation and evolution.

Authors:  G L Stebbins
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-06-10       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  A copia-like transposable element family in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  D F Voytas; F M Ausubel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-11-17       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Lengths of chromosomal segments conserved since divergence of man and mouse.

Authors:  J H Nadeau; B A Taylor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Map-based cloning of a gene controlling omega-3 fatty acid desaturation in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  V Arondel; B Lemieux; I Hwang; S Gibson; H M Goodman; C R Somerville
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-11-20       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Linkage Map of Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  H. G. Nam; J. Giraudat; B. Den Boer; F. Moonan; WDB. Loos; B. M. Hauge; H. M. Goodman
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 11.277

9.  Comparative genome mapping of Sorghum and maize.

Authors:  R Whitkus; J Doebley; M Lee
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations.

Authors:  E S Lander; P Green; J Abrahamson; A Barlow; M J Daly; S E Lincoln; L A Newberg; L Newburg
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.736

View more
  91 in total

1.  Genome mapping in capsicum and the evolution of genome structure in the solanaceae.

Authors:  K D Livingstone; V K Lackney; J R Blauth; R van Wijk; M K Jahn
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Locus-specific contig assembly in highly-duplicated genomes, using the BAC-RF method.

Authors:  Y R Lin; X Draye; X Qian; S Ren; L H Zhu; J Tomkins; R A Wing; Z Li; A H Paterson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-04-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Quantitative trait loci: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  B Goffinet; S Gerber
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Extensive duplication and reshuffling in the Arabidopsis genome.

Authors:  G Blanc; A Barakat; R Guyot; R Cooke; M Delseny
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 5.  Through a genome, darkly: comparative analysis of plant chromosomal DNA.

Authors:  Graham J King
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 6.  Plant genome evolution: lessons from comparative genomics at the DNA level.

Authors:  Renate Schmidt
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.076

7.  Numerous small rearrangements of gene content, order and orientation differentiate grass genomes.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Bennetzen; Wusirika Ramakrishna
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 8.  Comparative genomics of plant chromosomes.

Authors:  A H Paterson; J E Bowers; M D Burow; X Draye; C G Elsik; C X Jiang; C S Katsar; T H Lan; Y R Lin; R Ming; R J Wright
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 11.277

9.  Comparing the linkage maps of the close relatives Arabidopsis lyrata and A. thaliana.

Authors:  Helmi Kuittinen; Anita A de Haan; Claus Vogl; Sami Oikarinen; Johanna Leppälä; Marcus Koch; Tom Mitchell-Olds; Charles H Langley; Outi Savolainen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Syntenic relationships between Medicago truncatula and Arabidopsis reveal extensive divergence of genome organization.

Authors:  Hongyan Zhu; Dong-Jin Kim; Jong-Min Baek; Hong-Kyu Choi; Leland C Ellis; Helge Küester; W Richard McCombie; Hui-Mei Peng; Douglas R Cook
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 8.340

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.