Literature DB >> 10983456

Chunking processes in the learning of event sequences: electrophysiological indicators.

F Schlaghecken1, B Stürmer, M Eimer.   

Abstract

The present study investigated whether effects of implicit learning (IL) are due to well-learned and explicitly represented parts of the stimulus material ("chunks"). To this purpose, event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded during an oddball-version of a serial reaction time (RT) task: At unpredictable positions within a 16-item letter sequence, single deviant items replaced an item of the repeatedly presented standard sequence. After acquisition, the "process dissociation procedure" (Jacoby, 1991) was adopted to identify explicitly learned sequence parts for each participant. Acquisition of sequence knowledge was reflected in faster RTs for standard items than for deviant items and in enhanced N2b and P3b components for deviant items. While the ERP effects were obtained for explicitly represented sequence parts only, RT effects were independent of subsequent reproduction performance. These results indicated that (1) ERPs are a valid measure of explicit knowledge, (2) implicit and explicit knowledge coexist in serial RT tasks, and (3) chunking processes play a major role in the acquisition of explicit knowledge about event sequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10983456     DOI: 10.3758/bf03198417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  20 in total

1.  Conscious knowledge and changes in performance in sequence learning: evidence against dissociation.

Authors:  P Perruchet; M A Amorim
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Explicit and implicit learning of event sequences: evidence from event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  M Eimer; T Goschke; F Schlaghecken; B Stürmer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  An ERP analysis of implicit structured sequence learning.

Authors:  K B Baldwin; M Kutas
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  On the development of procedural knowledge.

Authors:  D B Willingham; M J Nissen; P Bullemer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Acquisition of procedural knowledge about a pattern of stimuli that cannot be articulated.

Authors:  P Lewicki; T Hill; E Bizot
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Motor sequence learning: a study with positron emission tomography.

Authors:  I H Jenkins; D J Brooks; P D Nixon; R S Frackowiak; R E Passingham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Implicit learning.

Authors:  C A Seger
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  The impact of motor responses on serial-pattern learning.

Authors:  M Ziessler
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1994

9.  On the influence of task relevance and stimulus probability on event-related-potential components.

Authors:  K C Squires; E Donchin; R I Herning; G McCarthy
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1977-01

10.  Presidential address, 1980. Surprise!...Surprise?

Authors:  E Donchin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  17 in total

1.  The transition from implicit to explicit representations in incidental learning situations: more evidence from high-frequency EEG coupling.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel; Hilde Haider; Michael Rose
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The problem of reversals in assessing implicit sequence learning with serial reaction time tasks.

Authors:  Joaquín M M Vaquero; Luis Jiménez; Juan Lupiáñez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Distributed representations of action sequences in anterior cingulate cortex: A recurrent neural network approach.

Authors:  Danesh Shahnazian; Clay B Holroyd
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

4.  Action-effects enhance explicit sequential learning.

Authors:  Sarah Esser; Hilde Haider
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-06-16

5.  Tracking neural correlates of successful learning over repeated sequence observations.

Authors:  Natalie A Steinemann; Clara Moisello; M Felice Ghilardi; Simon P Kelly
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Eye movements and imitation learning: intentional disruption of expectation.

Authors:  Jessica Maryott; Abigail Noyce; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Exploring the neurodevelopment of visual statistical learning using event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Ethan Jost; Christopher M Conway; John D Purdy; Anne M Walk; Michelle A Hendricks
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Similar Neural Correlates for Language and Sequential Learning: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials.

Authors:  Morten H Christiansen; Christopher M Conway; Luca Onnis
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2012-01-01

9.  Violations of newly-learned predictions elicit two distinct P3 components.

Authors:  Abigail Noyce; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Recurrent boosting effects of short inactivity delays on performance: an ERPs study.

Authors:  Remy Schmitz; Manuel Schabus; Fabien Perrin; André Luxen; Pierre Maquet; Philippe Peigneux
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2009-08-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.