Literature DB >> 7807103

Midterm results (5.5-10 years) of acetabular allograft reconstruction with the acetabular reinforcement ring during total hip revision.

M K Zehntner1, R Ganz.   

Abstract

Acetabular reconstructions using frozen femoral head allografts and the acetabular reinforcement ring of M. E. Müeller (Protek AG, Bern) have been analyzed after an average follow-up period of 7.2 years (range, 5.5-10 years) in 27 patients/hips. The deficiencies, according to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons classification, were 1 segmental, 14 cavitary, and 12 combined cavity and segmental. Twenty-two (82%) of the reconstructions were classified as adequate and five (18%) as inadequate based on the operative report and radiographic assessment, including anteroposterior, oblique, and lateral views. Reconstructions were considered adequate if an appropriate sized ring had been used in accordance with the recommendations of the authors (contact on host pelvic bone cranially, posteriorly, and inferomedially). Radiographic evaluation revealed acetabular component migration of more than 2 mm in 12 reconstructions (44%). Of these, cranial migration averaged 4 mm (range, 2-9 mm) in inadequate reconstructions, whereas it averaged only 2 mm (range, 1-4 mm) in adequate reconstructions. The incidence of migration in adequate reconstructions for segmental only and combined cavitary and segmental defects was 6 of 12 (50%), whereas it was 1 of 10 in reconstructions of cavitary deficiencies. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis revealed a 79.6% probability of survival at 10 years with revision as the endpoint for failure. It is concluded that durability of the reconstruction can be expected if support of the metallic reinforcement device is provided by host-bone. Segmental and combined deficiencies may require additional internal fixation by plates and screws.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7807103     DOI: 10.1016/0883-5403(94)90092-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  19 in total

1.  [Mega cups and partial pelvic replacement].

Authors:  R von Eisenhart-Rothe; H Gollwitzer; A Toepfer; H Pilge; B M Holzapfel; H Rechl; R Gradinger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  The value of bulk femoral head allograft in acetabular reconstruction using Kerboull-type plate.

Authors:  Daisuke Inoue; Tamon Kabata; Toru Maeda; Yoshitomo Kajino; Takashi Yamamoto; Tomoharu Takagi; Takaaki Oomori; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-12       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [Exchange of acetabular cups with severe bone defects using antiprotrusion cages].

Authors:  Bernd Fink; Alexandra Grossmann; Pavel Sebena
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.154

4.  Mid-term results of acetabular reconstruction using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device.

Authors:  Junji Hori; Yuji Yasunaga; Takuma Yamasaki; Tomokazu Yoshida; Seigo Oshima; Keiichiro Yamasaki; Toshihiro Matsuo; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Use of freeze-dried bone allografts in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Maurice Caltran; Claude Savornin; Patrick Le Couteur; Paul Jouan; Philippe Deroche; Jean-François Vinceneux; Laurence Barnouin
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2002-12-17

Review 6.  Acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  George W Fryhofer; Sireesh Ramesh; Neil P Sheth
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-12-02

7.  Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty with a modular revision system and biological defect augmentation.

Authors:  Jan Schmolders; Max J Friedrich; Robert D Michel; Thomas M Randau; Matthias D Wimmer; Andreas C Strauss; Hendrik Kohlhof; Dieter C Wirtz; Sascha Gravius
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-10-04       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  [Norian SRS augmentation in revision of acetabular cup of total hip arthroplasty. A follow up of six patients].

Authors:  M Müller; R Stangl
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  [Acetabular reinforcement rings in revision total hip arthroplasty: midterm results in 298 cases].

Authors:  U J Schlegel; R G Bitsch; M Pritsch; P R Aldinger; H Mau; S J Breusch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage: medium follow-up results.

Authors:  J Lamo-Espinosa; J Duart Clemente; P Díaz-Rada; J Pons-Villanueva; J R Valentí-Nín
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2012-12-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.