Literature DB >> 7800742

Differences in taste responses to Polycose and common sugars in the rat as revealed by behavioral and electrophysiological studies.

N Sako1, T Shimura, M Komure, R Mochizuki, R Matsuo, T Yamamoto.   

Abstract

Behavioral and electrophysiological experiments were performed to examine the suggestion that rats have two types of carbohydrate taste receptors, one for polysaccharides (e.g., Polycose) and one for common sugars (e.g., sucrose). Qualitative difference between the tastes of Polycose and sugars including sucrose, maltose, glucose, and fructose was surveyed by means of a conditioned taste aversion paradigm in which the number of licks for 20 s to each taste stimulus was measured. Aversive conditioning to Polycose did not generalize to sugars, while aversive conditioning to sucrose generalized to other sugars, but not to Polycose. In the electrophysiological study, taste responses of the whole chorda tympani were recorded. A proteolytic enzyme, pronase E, suppressed nerve responses to both Polycose and sugars to less than 50%. A novel anti-sweet peptide, gurmarin, strongly suppressed responses to sugars, but had essentially no effect on Polycose responses. On the other hand, KHCO3 enhanced responses to sugars to about 300%, but had little effect on Polycose responses. These results have confirmed the notion that rats can differentiate the tastes between Polycose and common sugars and that rats have two types of carbohydrate receptors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7800742     DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)90236-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  22 in total

1.  Nutrient preference and diet-induced adiposity in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  A A Bachmanov; D R Reed; M G Tordoff; R A Price; G K Beauchamp
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2001-03

2.  Orosensory detection of sucrose, maltose, and glucose is severely impaired in mice lacking T1R2 or T1R3, but Polycose sensitivity remains relatively normal.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Assessing behavioral control across reinforcer solutions on a fixed-ratio schedule of reinforcement in rats.

Authors:  Joel E Shillinglaw; Ian K Everitt; Donita L Robinson
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 2.405

4.  Cross-Generalization Profile to Orosensory Stimuli of Rats Conditioned to Avoid a High Fat/High Sugar Diet.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Timothy H Moran
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 5.  The functional role of the T1R family of receptors in sweet taste and feeding.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Kimberly R Smith; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-03-02

6.  Behavioral evidence for a glucose polymer taste receptor that is independent of the T1R2+3 heterodimer in a mouse model.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Kimberly R Smith; Alan C Spector
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Gustatory responsiveness to polycose in four species of nonhuman primates.

Authors:  M Laska; S Kohlmann; H P Scheuber; L T Hernandez Salazar; E Rodriguez Luna
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Amino acid and carbohydrate preferences in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-08-08

9.  Maltodextrin and sucrose preferences in sweet-sensitive (C57BL/6J) and subsensitive (129P3/J) mice revisited.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-08-12

10.  Gustatory insular cortex lesions disrupt drug-induced, but not lithium chloride-induced, suppression of conditioned stimulus intake.

Authors:  Rastafa I Geddes; Li Han; Anne E Baldwin; Ralph Norgren; Patricia S Grigson
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.