Literature DB >> 22661618

Influences of spontaneous perspective taking on spatial and identity processing of faces.

Anne Böckler1, Jan Zwickel.   

Abstract

Previous research suggests that people, when interacting with another agent, are sensitive to the other's visual perspective on the scene. The present study investigated how spontaneously another's different spatial perspective is taken into account and how this affects the processing of jointly attended stimuli. Participants viewed upright or inverted faces alone, next to another person (same spatial perspective), or opposite another person (different spatial perspectives) while electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded. The task (counting male faces) was in no way related to spatial aspects of the stimuli, and thus did not encourage perspective taking. EEG results revealed no general differences between viewing faces alone or with another person. However, when holding different perspectives (sitting opposite each other), the amplitudes of the N170 and of the N250 significantly increased for upright faces. This indicates that people spontaneously represented the other's different perspective, which led to higher demands for structural encoding (N170) and to increased allocation of attention to face recognition (N250) for stimuli that are typically processed configurally. When holding different spatial perspectives, thus, people may not merely represent that the other sees the object or scene differently, but how the object/scene looks for the other.

Entities:  

Keywords:  face processing; joint attention; perspective taking

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22661618      PMCID: PMC3791061          DOI: 10.1093/scan/nss061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci        ISSN: 1749-5016            Impact factor:   3.436


  30 in total

1.  Modulation of event-related potentials by prototypical and atypical faces.

Authors:  H Halit; M de Haan; M H Johnson
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2000-06-26       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions.

Authors:  Stefan R Schweinberger; Esther C Pickering; Ines Jentzsch; A Mike Burton; Jürgen M Kaufmann
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2002-11

3.  Early face processing specificity: it's in the eyes!

Authors:  Roxane J Itier; Claude Alain; Katherine Sedore; Anthony R McIntosh
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The time course of implicit processing of facial features: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  F Pesciarelli; M Sarlo; I Leo
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  What causes the face inversion effect?

Authors:  M J Farah; J W Tanaka; H M Drain
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Seeing it their way: evidence for rapid and involuntary computation of what other people see.

Authors:  Dana Samson; Ian A Apperly; Jason J Braithwaite; Benjamin J Andrews; Sarah E Bodley Scott
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Seeing the world through another person's eyes: simulating selective attention via action observation.

Authors:  Alexandra Frischen; Daniel Loach; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-03-17

8.  Agency attribution and visuospatial perspective taking.

Authors:  Jan Zwickel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-12

9.  Embodied and disembodied cognition: spatial perspective-taking.

Authors:  Barbara Tversky; Bridgette Martin Hard
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-12-03

10.  Making oneself predictable: reduced temporal variability facilitates joint action coordination.

Authors:  Cordula Vesper; Robrecht P R D van der Wel; Günther Knoblich; Natalie Sebanz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.