Literature DB >> 26724954

The influence of natural contour and face size on the spatial frequency tuning for identifying upright and inverted faces.

Jessica Royer1, Verena Willenbockel2, Caroline Blais1, Frédéric Gosselin3, Sandra Lafortune1, Josiane Leclerc1, Daniel Fiset4.   

Abstract

It has previously been proposed that holistic face processing is based on low spatial frequencies (SFs) whereas featural processing relies on higher SFs, a hypothesis still widespread in the face processing literature today (e.g. Peters et al. in Eur J Neurosci 37(9):1448-1457, 2013). Since upright faces are supposedly recognized through holistic processing and inverted faces, using features, it is easy to take the leap to suggest a qualitatively different SF tuning for the identification of upright and vs. inverted faces. However, two independent studies (e.g. Gaspar et al. in Vision Res 48(28):2817-2826, 2008; Willenbockel et al. in J Exp Psychol Human 36(1):122-135, 2010a) found the same SF tuning for both stimulus presentations. Since these authors used relatively small faces hiding the natural facial contour, it is possible that differences in the SF tuning for identifying upright and inverted faces were missed. The present study thus revisits the SF tuning for upright and inverted faces face identification using the SF Bubbles technique. Our results still indicate that the same SFs are involved in both upright and inverted face recognition regardless of these additional parameters (contour and size), thus contrasting with previous data obtained using different methods (e.g. Oruc and Barton in J Vis 10(12):20, 1-12, 2010). The possible reasons subtending this divergence are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26724954     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-015-0740-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  47 in total

1.  Configural face encoding and spatial frequency information.

Authors:  Isabelle Boutet; Charles Collin; Jocelyn Faubert
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-10

2.  Inversion leads to quantitative, not qualitative, changes in face processing.

Authors:  Allison B Sekuler; Carl M Gaspar; Jason M Gold; Patrick J Bennett
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 3.  How does the brain process upright and inverted faces?

Authors:  Bruno Rossion; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev       Date:  2002-03

4.  Holistic processing for faces operates over a wide range of sizes but is strongest at identification rather than conversational distances.

Authors:  Elinor McKone
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Distinguishing the cause and consequence of face inversion: the perceptual field hypothesis.

Authors:  Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2009-09-10

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  What causes the face inversion effect?

Authors:  M J Farah; J W Tanaka; H M Drain
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The face inversion effect in infants is driven by high, and not low, spatial frequencies.

Authors:  Karen R Dobkins; Rachael Harms
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Holistic Processing in the Composite Task Depends on Face Size.

Authors:  David A Ross; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2015-06-19

10.  Diagnostic spatial frequencies and human efficiency for discriminating actions.

Authors:  Steven M Thurman; Emily D Grossman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  2 in total

1.  Time Course of Cultural Differences in Spatial Frequency Use for Face Identification.

Authors:  Amanda Estéphan; Daniel Fiset; Camille Saumure; Marie-Pier Plouffe-Demers; Ye Zhang; Dan Sun; Caroline Blais
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  The role of spatial frequencies for facial pain categorization.

Authors:  Isabelle Charbonneau; Joël Guérette; Stéphanie Cormier; Caroline Blais; Guillaume Lalonde-Beaudoin; Fraser W Smith; Daniel Fiset
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.