Literature DB >> 24777442

The perception of a familiar face is no more than the sum of its parts.

Jason M Gold1, Jarrett D Barker, Shawn Barr, Jennifer L Bittner, Alexander Bratch, W Drew Bromfield, Roy A Goode, Mary Jones, Doori Lee, Aparna Srinath.   

Abstract

Why do faces become easier to recognize with repeated exposure? Previous research has suggested that familiarity may induce a qualitative shift in visual processing from an independent analysis of individual facial features to analysis that includes information about the relationships among features (Farah, Wilson, Drain, & Tanaka Psychological Review, 105, 482-498, 1998; Maurer, Grand, & Mondloch Trends in Cognitive Science, 6, 255-260, 2002). We tested this idea by using a "summation-at-threshold" technique (Gold, Mundy, & Tjan Psychological Science, 23, 427-434, 2012; Nandy & Tjan Journal of Vision, 8, 3.1-20, 2008), in which an observer's ability to recognize each individual facial feature shown independently is used to predict their ability to recognize all of the features shown in combination. We find that, although people are better overall at recognizing familiar as opposed to unfamiliar faces, their ability to integrate information across features is similar for unfamiliar and highly familiar faces and is well predicted by their ability to recognize each of the facial features shown in isolation. These results are consistent with the idea that familiarity has a quantitative effect on the efficiency with which information is extracted from individual features, rather than a qualitative effect on the process by which features are combined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24777442      PMCID: PMC4213323          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0632-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  44 in total

1.  Show me the features! Understanding recognition from the use of visual information.

Authors:  Philippe G Schyns; Lizann Bonnar; Frédéric Gosselin
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-09

2.  Inversion leads to quantitative, not qualitative, changes in face processing.

Authors:  Allison B Sekuler; Carl M Gaspar; Jason M Gold; Patrick J Bennett
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Unfamiliar faces are not faces: evidence from a matching task.

Authors:  Ahmed M Megreya; A Mike Burton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-06

4.  Familiar other-race faces show normal holistic processing and are robust to perceptual stress.

Authors:  Elinor McKone; Jacqueline L Brewer; Sarah MacPherson; Gillian Rhodes; William G Hayward
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Holistic processing of faces: perceptual and decisional components.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Isabel Gauthier; Michael J Wenger; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  The effect of spatial frequency on perceptual learning of inverted faces.

Authors:  Adélaïde de Heering; Daphne Maurer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  What causes the face inversion effect?

Authors:  M J Farah; J W Tanaka; H M Drain
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: some implications for theories of face recognition.

Authors:  H D Ellis; J W Shepherd; G M Davies
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition.

Authors:  M Moscovitch; G Winocur; M Behrmann
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  6 in total

1.  Brain structure differences between Chinese and Caucasian cohorts: A comprehensive morphometry study.

Authors:  Yuchun Tang; Lu Zhao; Yunxia Lou; Yonggang Shi; Rui Fang; Xiangtao Lin; Shuwei Liu; Arthur Toga
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The perception of a face can be greater than the sum of its parts.

Authors:  Jianhong Shen; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-06

3.  Distinct neural processes for the perception of familiar versus unfamiliar faces along the visual hierarchy revealed by EEG.

Authors:  Elliot Collins; Amanda K Robinson; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Integration of facial features under memory load.

Authors:  K Ölander; I Muukkonen; T P Saarela; V R Salmela
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Differences in cortical structure between cognitively normal East Asian and Caucasian older adults: a surface-based morphometry study.

Authors:  Dong Woo Kang; Sheng-Min Wang; Hae-Ran Na; Sonya Youngju Park; Nak Young Kim; Chang Uk Lee; Donghyeon Kim; Seong-Jin Son; Hyun Kook Lim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Cortical Pathways or Mechanism in the Face Inversion Effect in Patients with First-Episode Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Yi Liu; Taiyong Bi; Qijie Kuang; Bei Zhang; Huawang Wu; Haijing Li; Bin Zhang; Jingping Zhao; Yuping Ning; Shenglin She; Yingjun Zheng
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 2.570

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.