Literature DB >> 7753987

Contrast and dose with Mo-Mo, Mo-Rh, and Rh-Rh target-filter combinations in mammography.

E L Gingold1, X Wu, G T Barnes.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the effect of three mammography target-filter combinations on contrast and dose.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: With screen-film sensitometry, the contrast of a calcification target embedded in simulated breast tissue was measured for three target-filter combinations--molybdenum-molybdenum (Mo-Mo), molybdenum rhodium (Mo-Rh), and rhodium-rhodium (Rh-Rh)--as a function of x-ray tube potential, breast thickness, and breast composition. The corresponding average glandular tissue doses were also determined.
RESULTS: Contrast and dose decreased with increasing kilovolt peak with all three target-filter combinations. Contrast was highest for Mo-Mo and lowest for Rh-Rh for images exposed with a low kilovoltage (< 29 kVp). For thick or radiographically dense phantoms, the contrast produced with Mo-Mo was less than or equal to that produced by the other two x-ray spectra when a higher kilovoltage (> or = 29 kVp) was selected. Average glandular dose was greatest for Mo-Mo and lowest for Rh-Rh for all phantom thicknesses, breast compositions, and tube potentials studied.
CONCLUSIONS: For the thick or dense breast, the alternative target-filter selections can achieve contrast comparable to or better than that obtainable with Mo-Mo while using a smaller dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7753987     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.195.3.7753987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  7 in total

1.  The effect of the antiscatter grid on full-field digital mammography phantom images.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Experimental investigation on the choice of the tungsten/rhodium anode/filter combination for an amorphous selenium-based digital mammography system.

Authors:  Paula Toroi; Federica Zanca; Kenneth C Young; Chantal van Ongeval; Guy Marchal; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Radiomics robustness assessment and classification evaluation: A two-stage method demonstrated on multivendor FFDM.

Authors:  Kayla Robinson; Hui Li; Li Lan; David Schacht; Maryellen Giger
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Determination of linear x-ray attenuation coefficients of pathological brain tissues and use of filters in tissue contrast enhancement in computed tomography.

Authors:  M Erdem Sagsoz; Fazlı Erdogan; Salih Z Erzeneoglu; İhsan Yuce
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2010-08

5.  Image Quality and Radiation Dose for Fibrofatty Breast using Target/filter Combinations in Two Digital Mammography Systems.

Authors:  Khaled Alkhalifah; Akram Asbeutah; Ajit Brindhaban
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2020-09-07

6.  Characterization of the imaging settings in screening mammography using a tracking and reporting system: A multi-center and multi-vendor analysis.

Authors:  Bruno Barufaldi; Samantha P Zuckerman; Regina B Medeiros; Andrew D Maidment; Homero Schiabel
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 2.685

7.  Dose comparison between screen/film and full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Gisella Gennaro; Cosimo di Maggio
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 7.034

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.