Literature DB >> 32143121

Characterization of the imaging settings in screening mammography using a tracking and reporting system: A multi-center and multi-vendor analysis.

Bruno Barufaldi1, Samantha P Zuckerman2, Regina B Medeiros3, Andrew D Maidment4, Homero Schiabel5.   

Abstract

A tracking and reporting system was developed to monitor radiation dose in X-ray breast imaging. We used our tracking system to characterize and compare the mammographic practices of five breast imaging centers located in the United States and Brazil. Clinical data were acquired using eight mammography systems comprising three modalities: computed radiography (CR), full-field digital mammography (FFDM), and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Our database consists of metadata extracted from 334,234 images. We analyzed distributions and correlations of compressed breast thickness (CBT), compression force, target-filter combinations, X-ray tube voltage, and average glandular dose (AGD). AGD reference curves were calculated based on AGD distributions as a function of CBT. These curves represent an AGD reference for a particular population and system. Differences in AGD and imaging settings were attributed to a combination of factors, such as improvements in technology, imaging protocol, and patient demographics. The tracking system allows the comparison of various imaging settings used in screening mammography, as well as the tracking of patient- and population-specific breast data collected from different populations.
Copyright © 2020 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed radiography; DICOM; Digital breast tomosynthesis; Digital mammography; Quality assurance

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32143121      PMCID: PMC7187399          DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.02.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  39 in total

1.  The readout thickness versus the measured thickness for a range of screen film mammography and full-field digital mammography units.

Authors:  Ingrid H R Hauge; Peter Hogg; Katy Szczepura; Paul Connolly; George McGill; Claire Mercer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  RADIANCE: An automated, enterprise-wide solution for archiving and reporting CT radiation dose estimates.

Authors:  Tessa S Cook; Stefan L Zimmerman; Scott R Steingall; Andrew D A Maidment; Woojin Kim; William W Boonn
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 3.  Digital breast tomosynthesis from concept to clinical care.

Authors:  Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography.

Authors:  J M Boone; T R Fewell; R J Jennings
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Parametrization of mammography normalized average glandular dose tables.

Authors:  W T Sobol; X Wu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Implementation of Synthesized Two-dimensional Mammography in a Population-based Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Program.

Authors:  Samantha P Zuckerman; Emily F Conant; Brad M Keller; Andrew D A Maidment; Bruno Barufaldi; Susan P Weinstein; Marie Synnestvedt; Elizabeth S McDonald
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Pressure and breast thickness in mammography--an exploratory calibration study.

Authors:  P Hogg; M Taylor; K Szczepura; C Mercer; E Denton
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Design and implementation of a radiation dose tracking and reporting system for mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Bruno Barufaldi; Homero Schiabel; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2019-02-16       Impact factor: 2.685

9.  Digital Compared with Screen-Film Mammography: Measures of Diagnostic Accuracy among Women Screened in the Ontario Breast Screening Program.

Authors:  Maegan V Prummel; Derek Muradali; Rene Shumak; Vicky Majpruz; Patrick Brown; Hedy Jiang; Susan J Done; Martin J Yaffe; Anna M Chiarelli
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Evaluation of Doses and Image Quality in Mammography with Screen-Film, CR, and DR Detectors - Application of the ACR Phantom.

Authors:  Wioletta Ślusarczyk-Kacprzyk; Witold Skrzyński; Ewa Fabiszewska
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2016-08-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.