Literature DB >> 7737395

Perception of arm orientation in three-dimensional space.

W G Darling1, G F Miller.   

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the preferred coordinate system for perception of arm (humerus) orientation in three-dimensional space. Perception of arm orientation relative to trunk-fixed versus earth-fixed axes were compared in seven human subjects. The experimenter first moved the subject's trunk and arm into a target configuration (in which the arm's orientation relative to the trunk and/or earth was perceived and memorized by the subject) and then moved the trunk and arm to a new configuration. The blindfolded subject then attempted to reproduce the target orientation of their arm relative to either the trunk (i.e., reproduce shoulder angles--intrinsic kinesthetic coordinate system) or earth-fixed axes (extrinsic kinesthetic coordinate system). Perceptual errors were similar for both shoulder (arm relative to trunk) and extrinsic (arm relative to earth) angles. However, elevation angles were perceived with greater accuracy than yaw angles in the two coordinate systems. Also, perceptual errors for arm yaw angles in the extrinsic kinesthetic coordinate system task were better predicted from changes in trunk orientation than the errors for other angles. Furthermore, four subjects matched arm yaw angle relative to the trunk-fixed axis more accurately than to the earth-fixed axis in the extrinsic coordinate system task. These results suggests a bias toward perception of yaw angles relative to trunk-fixed axes (i.e., in an intrinsic coordinate system). These data suggest that the preferred coordinate system for kinesthetic perception of arm orientation is probably fixed in the trunk.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7737395     DOI: 10.1007/bf00230653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  8 in total

1.  Perception of forearm angles in 3-dimensional space.

Authors:  W G Darling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Is there a preferred coordinate system for perception of hand orientation in three-dimensional space?

Authors:  W G Darling; L Gilchrist
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Sensorimotor representations for pointing to targets in three-dimensional space.

Authors:  J F Soechting; M Flanders
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Errors in pointing are due to approximations in sensorimotor transformations.

Authors:  J F Soechting; M Flanders
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Limb segment inclination sense in proprioception.

Authors:  C J Worringham; G E Stelmach; Z E Martin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Transformations between visual and kinesthetic coordinate systems in reaches to remembered object locations and orientations.

Authors:  W G Darling; G F Miller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Psychophysical determination of coordinate representation of human arm orientation.

Authors:  J F Soechting; B Ross
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Does position sense at the elbow reflect a sense of elbow joint angle or one of limb orientation?

Authors:  J F Soechting
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1982-09-30       Impact factor: 3.252

  8 in total
  8 in total

1.  From head orientation to hand control: evidence of both neck and vestibular involvement in hand drawing.

Authors:  Michel Guerraz; Jean Blouin; Jean-Louis Vercher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Accuracy of spatial localization depending on head posture in a perturbed gravitoinertial force field.

Authors:  J-M Prieur; C Bourdin; J-L Vercher; F Sarès; J Blouin; G M Gauthier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual perceptions of head-fixed and trunk-fixed anterior/posterior axes.

Authors:  W G Darling; A J Butler; T E Williams
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Kinesthetic perception of visually specified axes.

Authors:  Warren G Darling; Robert Bartelt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-01-11       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Influence of whole-body pitch tilt and kinesthetic cues on the perceived gravity-referenced eye level.

Authors:  L Bringoux; K Tamura; M Faldon; M A Gresty; A M Bronstein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Effects of altered sagittal trunk orientation on kinetic pattern in able-bodied walking on uneven ground.

Authors:  Soran Aminiaghdam; Christian Rode
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 2.422

7.  Patients with type 2 diabetes demonstrate proprioceptive deficit in the knee.

Authors:  Lucas Richard Ettinger; Ami Boucher; Elisabeth Simonovich
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2018-03-15

8.  Pointing to One's Moving Hand: Putative Internal Models Do Not Contribute to Proprioceptive Acuity.

Authors:  Warren G Darling; Brian M Wall; Chris R Coffman; Charles Capaday
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.