Literature DB >> 1769395

Perception of forearm angles in 3-dimensional space.

W G Darling1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine a preferred coordinate system for representation of forearm orientation in 3-dimensional space. In one experiment, the ability of human subjects to perceive angles of the forearm in 3-dimensional space (forearm elevation and yaw--extrinsic coordinate system) was compared to their ability to perceive elbow joint angle (intrinsic coordinate system). While blindfolded, subjects performed an angle reproduction task in which the experimenter first positioned the upper limb in a reference trial. This was followed, after movement of the subject's entire upper limb to a different position, by an attempt to reproduce or match a criterior angle of the reference trial by motion of the forearm in elbow flexion or extension only. Note that matching of the criterion forearm angle in the new upper limb position could not be accomplished by reproducing the entire reference upper limb position, but only by angular motion at the elbow. Matching of all 3 criterion angles was accomplished with about equal accuracy in terms of absolute constant errors and variable errors. Correlation analysis of the perceptual errors showed that forearm elevation and elbow angle perception errors were not biased but that forearm yaw angle matching showed a bias toward elbow angle matching in 7 of 9 subjects. That is errors in forearm yaw perception were attributed to a tendency toward a preferred intrinsic coordinate system for perception of forearm orientation. These results show that subjects can accurately perceive angles in both extrinsic and intrinsic coordinate systems in 3-dimensional space. Thus, these data conflict with previous reports of highly inaccurate perception of elbow joint angles in comparison to perception of forearm elevation. In an attempt to resolve this conflict with previous results, a second experiment was carried out in which perception of forearm elevation and elbow joint angles with the forearm motion constrained to a vertical plane. Results of this experiment showed that during a two-limb elbow angle matching task, four of five subjects exhibited a clear bias toward forearm elevation angle. During a one-limb angle reproduction task only two of five subjects exhibited such a bias. Perception of elevation angles show little bias toward elbow angle matching.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1769395     DOI: 10.1007/bf00231862

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  15 in total

1.  Arm muscle activation for static forces in three-dimensional space.

Authors:  M Flanders; J F Soechting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Is there a preferred coordinate system for perception of hand orientation in three-dimensional space?

Authors:  W G Darling; L Gilchrist
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Sensorimotor representations for pointing to targets in three-dimensional space.

Authors:  J F Soechting; M Flanders
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Kinesthetic sensibility.

Authors:  D I McCloskey
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 37.312

5.  Neck muscle vibration modifies the representation of visual motion and direction in man.

Authors:  B Biguer; I M Donaldson; A Hein; M Jeannerod
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents.

Authors:  G M Goodwin; D I McCloskey; P B Matthews
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Psychophysical determination of coordinate representation of human arm orientation.

Authors:  J F Soechting; B Ross
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  The contribution of gravitational torques to limb position sense.

Authors:  C J Worringham; G E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Muscles across the elbow joint: a biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  K N An; F C Hui; B F Morrey; R L Linscheid; E Y Chao
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Separate control of arm position and velocity demonstrated by vibration of muscle tendon in man.

Authors:  A C Sittig; J J Denier van der Gon; C C Gielen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  13 in total

1.  Where is your arm? Variations in proprioception across space and tasks.

Authors:  Christina T Fuentes; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Perception of arm orientation in three-dimensional space.

Authors:  W G Darling; G F Miller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Transformations between visual and kinesthetic coordinate systems in reaches to remembered object locations and orientations.

Authors:  W G Darling; G F Miller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Manual matching of perceived surface orientation is affected by arm posture: evidence of calibration between proprioception and visual experience in near space.

Authors:  Zhi Li; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Kinesthetic perception of visually specified axes.

Authors:  Warren G Darling; Robert Bartelt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-01-11       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The influence of external loads on movement precision during active shoulder internal rotation movements as measured by 3 indices of accuracy.

Authors:  Timothy J Brindle; Timothy L Uhl; Arthur J Nitz; Robert Shapiro
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2006 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Mapping proprioception across a 2D horizontal workspace.

Authors:  Elizabeth T Wilson; Jeremy Wong; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Perception of hand motion direction uses a gravitational reference.

Authors:  Warren G Darling; Angela N Viaene; Clayton R Peterson; James P Schmiedeler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Perception of limb orientation in the vertical plane depends on center of mass rather than inertial eigenvectors.

Authors:  Rolf van de Langenberg; Idsart Kingma; Peter J Beek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Proprioceptive bimanual test in intrinsic and extrinsic coordinates.

Authors:  Riccardo Iandolo; Valentina Squeri; Dalia De Santis; Psiche Giannoni; Pietro Morasso; Maura Casadio
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.