Literature DB >> 8519342

Transformations between visual and kinesthetic coordinate systems in reaches to remembered object locations and orientations.

W G Darling1, G F Miller.   

Abstract

The abilities of human subjects to perform reach and grasp movements to remembered locations/orientations of a cylindrical object were studied under four conditions: (1) visual presentation of the object-reach with vision allowed; (2) visual presentation-reach while blindfolded; (3) kinesthetic presentation of the object-reach while blindfolded and (4) kinesthetic presentation-reach with vision. The results showed that subjects were very accurate in locating the object in the purely kinesthetic condition and that directional errors were low in all four conditions; but, predictable errors in reach distance occurred in conditions 1,2, and 4. The pattern of these distance errors was similar to that identified in previous research using a pointing task to a small target (i.e., overshoots of close targets, undershoots of far targets). The observation that the pattern of distance errors in condition 4 was similar to that of conditions 1 and 2 suggests that subjects transform kinesthetically defined hand locations into a visual coordinate system when vision is available during upper limb motion to a remembered kinesthetic target. The differences in orientation of the upper limb between target and reach positions in condition 3 were similar in magnitude to the errors associated with kinesthetic perceptions of arm and hand orientations in three-dimensional space reported in previous studies. However, fingertip location was specified with greater accuracy than the orientation of upper limb segments. This was apparently accomplished by compensation of variations in shoulder (arm) angles with oppositely directed variations in elbow joint angles. Subjects were also able to transform visually perceived object orientation into an appropriate hand orientation for grasp, as indicated by the relation between hand roll angle and object orientation (elevation angle). The implications of these results for control of upper limb motion to external targets are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8519342     DOI: 10.1007/BF00229368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  27 in total

1.  Is there a preferred coordinate system for perception of hand orientation in three-dimensional space?

Authors:  W G Darling; L Gilchrist
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Roles of proprioceptive input in the programming of arm trajectories.

Authors:  C Ghez; J Gordon; M F Ghilardi; C N Christakos; S E Cooper
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1990

3.  Sensorimotor representations for pointing to targets in three-dimensional space.

Authors:  J F Soechting; M Flanders
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Cerebellar neuronal activity related to whole-arm reaching movements in the monkey.

Authors:  P A Fortier; J F Kalaska; A M Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Primate motor cortex and free arm movements to visual targets in three-dimensional space. II. Coding of the direction of movement by a neuronal population.

Authors:  A P Georgopoulos; R E Kettner; A B Schwartz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Path constraints on point-to-point arm movements in three-dimensional space.

Authors:  F Lacquaniti; J F Soechting; S A Terzuolo
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement.

Authors:  M A Goodale; D Pelisson; C Prablanc
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Apr 24-30       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Organization of arm movements. Motion is segmented.

Authors:  J F Soechting; C A Terzuolo
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Kinematic variability of grasp movements as a function of practice and movement speed.

Authors:  W G Darling; K J Cole; J H Abbs
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Psychophysical determination of coordinate representation of human arm orientation.

Authors:  J F Soechting; B Ross
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.590

View more
  26 in total

1.  Neural mechanisms underlying reaching for remembered targets cued kinesthetically or visually in left or right hemispace.

Authors:  Andrew J Butler; Gereon R Fink; Christian Dohle; Gilbert Wunderlich; Lutz Tellmann; Rudiger J Seitz; Karl Zilles; Hans-Joachim Freund
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Different damping responses explain vertical endpoint error differences between visual conditions.

Authors:  Jan M Hondzinski; Chelsea M Soebbing; Allyson E French; Sara A Winges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Multiple frames of reference for pointing to a remembered target.

Authors:  Martin Lemay; George E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The effect of target modality on visual and proprioceptive contributions to the control of movement distance.

Authors:  Fabrice R Sarlegna; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Role of vision in aperture closure control during reach-to-grasp movements.

Authors:  Miya K Rand; Martin Lemay; Linda M Squire; Yury P Shimansky; George E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Location memory biases reveal the challenges of coordinating visual and kinesthetic reference frames.

Authors:  Vanessa R Simmering; Clayton Peterson; Warren Darling; John P Spencer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Pointing to oneself: active versus passive proprioception revisited and implications for internal models of motor system function.

Authors:  Charles Capaday; Warren G Darling; Konrad Stanek; Carl Van Vreeswijk
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Evidence of a limited visuo-motor memory used in programming wrist movements.

Authors:  R C Miall; P N Haggard; J D Cole
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Contribution of visual and proprioceptive information to the precision of reaching movements.

Authors:  Simona Monaco; Gregory Króliczak; Derek J Quinlan; Patrizia Fattori; Claudio Galletti; Melvyn A Goodale; Jody C Culham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Short-term memory for reaching to visual targets: psychophysical evidence for body-centered reference frames.

Authors:  J McIntyre; F Stratta; F Lacquaniti
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.