Literature DB >> 7706574

Intra-abdominal pressure measurement using a modified nasogastric tube: description and validation of a new technique.

M Sugrue1, M D Buist, A Lee, D J Sanchez, K M Hillman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the accuracy of an intragastric method of measuring intra-abdominal pressure (IAP).
DESIGN: Prospective sequential study with simultaneous paired measurement of gastric and urinary bladder pressures.
SETTING: Operating theatre, University Teaching Hospital. PATIENTS: 9 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were studied.
INTERVENTIONS: Intraperitoneal pressures were monitored during peritoneal insufflation at laparoscopy up to a pressure of 20 mmHg. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: Intra-abdominal pressure measurements were recorded simultaneously using a gastric balloon and urinary catheter. Gastric pressure may be up to 4 mmHg higher or 3 mmHg lower than urinary bladder pressure.
CONCLUSIONS: Intra-abdominal pressure can be measured easily in this new fashion, allowing a continuous pressure trend to be obtained without interfering with urinary output estimation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7706574     DOI: 10.1007/bf01705728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  11 in total

1.  Effect of increased intra-abdominal pressure on hepatic arterial, portal venous, and hepatic microcirculatory blood flow.

Authors:  L N Diebel; R F Wilson; S A Dulchavsky; J Saxe
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1992-08

2.  Impaired renal function due to raised intraabdominal pressure.

Authors:  C Platell; J Hall; G Dobb
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  THE EFFECT OF INCREASED INTRA-ABDOMINAL PRESSURE ON RENAL FUNCTION IN MAN.

Authors:  S E Bradley; G P Bradley
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1947-09       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Oliguria from high intra-abdominal pressure secondary to ovarian mass.

Authors:  G Celoria; J Steingrub; J A Dawson; D Teres
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Cardiovascular effects and acid-base and blood gas changes during laparoscopy.

Authors:  M Motew; A D Ivankovich; J Bieniarz; R F Albrecht; B Zahed; A Scommegna
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1973-04-01       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Determination of intra-abdominal pressure using a transurethral bladder catheter: clinical validation of the technique.

Authors:  T J Iberti; C E Lieber; E Benjamin
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  The measurement of intra-abdominal pressure as a criterion for abdominal re-exploration.

Authors:  I L Kron; P K Harman; S P Nolan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Acute renal failure associated with increased intra-abdominal pressure.

Authors:  W O Richards; W Scovill; B Shin; W Reed
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Intra-abdominal pressure and renal function after surgery to the abdominal aorta.

Authors:  C F Platell; J Hall; G Clarke; M Lawrence-Brown
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1990-03
View more
  24 in total

1.  Intra-abdominal pressure: time for clinical practice guidelines?

Authors:  Michael Sugrue
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2002-03-20       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Evaluation of two novel methods for the direct and continuous measurement of the intra-abdominal pressure in a porcine model.

Authors:  Alexander Schachtrupp; Christian Tons; Volker Fackeldey; Joerg Hoer; Marcus Reinges; Volker Schumpelick
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Intravesicular pressure monitoring does not cause urinary tract infection.

Authors:  Michael L Cheatham; Scott G Sagraves; Jeffery L Johnson; Mark W White
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Fluid vs. air for semicontinuous intra-abdominal pressure measurements using a compliance catheter.

Authors:  Jan J De Waele; Erik A I Billiet; Eric Hoste; Stijn I Blot; Francis A Colardyn
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  [Abdominal compartment syndrome].

Authors:  P Bertram; A Schachtrupp; R Rosch; O Schumacher; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Clinical examination is an inaccurate predictor of intraabdominal pressure.

Authors:  Michael Sugrue; Adrian Bauman; Felicity Jones; Gillian Bishop; Arthas Flabouris; Michael Parr; Anthony Stewart; Ken Hillman; Stephen A Deane
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  A study of intragastric and intravesicular pressure changes during rest, coughing, weight lifting, retching, and vomiting.

Authors:  Atif Iqbal; Mumnoon Haider; Rudolf J Stadlhuber; Anouki Karu; Sue Corkill; Charles J Filipi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Why we need guidelines and recommendations for research on intra-abdominal hypertension.

Authors:  Manu L N G Malbrain; Inneke De Laet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Intra-abdominal pressure can be measured by measuring the pressure within the stomach.

Authors:  G G Collee
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 10.  Current insights in intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome: open the abdomen and keep it open!

Authors:  Inneke E De Laet; Mariska Ravyts; Wesley Vidts; Jody Valk; Jan J De Waele; Manu L N G Malbrain
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.