Literature DB >> 18810545

A study of intragastric and intravesicular pressure changes during rest, coughing, weight lifting, retching, and vomiting.

Atif Iqbal1, Mumnoon Haider, Rudolf J Stadlhuber, Anouki Karu, Sue Corkill, Charles J Filipi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients undergoing a variety of procedures, surgical success is in part dependent on maintaining normal intra-abdominal pressure in the immediate postoperative period. Our objective was to quantify intragastric and intravesicular pressures during activities, through the use of manometry catheters.
METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers had a manometry catheter placed transnasally, and a urinary Foley catheter placed. Baseline intragastric and intravesicular pressures were recorded and the catheters were then transduced continuously. Pressures were recorded with activity: coughing, lifting weights, retching (dry heaving), and vomiting.
RESULTS: All pressure changes were significant from baseline except for weight lifting. The highest intragastric pressure was 290 mmHg, seen during vomiting. Comparison of intragastric and intravesicular pressures showed no significant difference. There was significantly higher intragastric pressure with vomiting and retching as compared with coughing, whereas coughing applied more pressure than weight lifting.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of intragastric pressures during vomiting and retching (dry heaving). We conclude that vomiting and retching (dry heaving) can render significant forces on any tissue apposition within the stomach or the peritoneal cavity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18810545     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-0080-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  22 in total

1.  Endoscopic full-thickness resection with sutured closure in a porcine model.

Authors:  Keiichi Ikeda; Annette Fritscher-Ravens; C Alexander Mosse; Tim Mills; Hisao Tajiri; C Paul Swain
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  A simple technique to accurately determine intra-abdominal pressure.

Authors:  T J Iberti; K M Kelly; D R Gentili; S Hirsch; E Benjamin
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Reproducibility of intra-abdominal pressure when lifting.

Authors:  P Mairiaux; J Malchaire; D Vandiepenbeeck; L Bellelahom
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1988

4.  Determination of intra-abdominal pressure using a transurethral bladder catheter: clinical validation of the technique.

Authors:  T J Iberti; C E Lieber; E Benjamin
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Normal intraabdominal pressure in healthy adults.

Authors:  William S Cobb; Justin M Burns; Kent W Kercher; Brent D Matthews; H James Norton; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  Surveyed opinion of American trauma surgeons on the prevention of the abdominal compartment syndrome.

Authors:  J C Mayberry; R K Goldman; R J Mullins; D M Brand; R A Crass; D D Trunkey
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1999-09

7.  Polyester (Parietex) mesh for total extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: initial experience in the United States.

Authors:  B Ramshaw; F Abiad; G Voeller; R Wilson; E Mason
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-11-20       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Modified mesh for hernia repair that is adapted to the physiology of the abdominal wall.

Authors:  U Klinge; B Klosterhalfen; J Conze; W Limberg; B Obolenski; A P Ottinger; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1998-12

9.  Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia.

Authors:  Jacobus W A Burger; Roland W Luijendijk; Wim C J Hop; Jens A Halm; Emiel G G Verdaasdonk; Johannes Jeekel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Assessment of diaphragmatic stressors as risk factors for symptomatic failure of laparoscopic nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  Atif Iqbal; Ganesh V Kakarlapudi; Ziad T Awad; Gleb Haynatzki; Kiran K Turaga; Anouki Karu; Katie Fritz; Mumnoon Haider; Sumeet K Mittal; Charles J Filipi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.267

View more
  27 in total

1.  Intra-abdominal Pressure Monitoring in Open Abdomen Management with Dynamic Abdominal Closure.

Authors:  A Ebru Sarer; Fahri Yetisir; Muhittin Aygar; Hasan Zafer Acar; Yılmaz Polat; Gokhan Osmanoglu
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 2.  Spinal cord injury and diaphragm neuromotor control.

Authors:  Matthew J Fogarty; Gary C Sieck
Journal:  Expert Rev Respir Med       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 3.772

3.  More complicated than it looks: the vagaries of calculating intra-abdominal pressure.

Authors:  Nadia M Hamad; Janet M Shaw; Ingrid E Nygaard; Tanner J Coleman; Yvonne Hsu; Marlene Egger; Robert W Hitchcock
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 4.  Leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: overview of pathogenesis and risk factors.

Authors:  Angelo Iossa; Mohamed Abdelgawad; Brad Michael Watkins; Gianfranco Silecchia
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Impact of two extubation techniques on the intra-abdominal pressure: a preliminary study.

Authors:  R Nemecek; E Nemecek; C Glaser; T Wallner; F Ratzinger; C Hollinsky
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Architectural design of the pelvic floor is consistent with muscle functional subspecialization.

Authors:  Lori J Tuttle; Olivia T Nguyen; Mark S Cook; Marianna Alperin; Sameer B Shah; Samuel R Ward; Richard L Lieber
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  Evolution and Functional Differentiation of the Diaphragm Muscle of Mammals.

Authors:  Matthew J Fogarty; Gary C Sieck
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 9.090

Review 8.  Activity restrictions after gynecologic surgery: is there evidence?

Authors:  Ingrid E Nygaard; Nadia M Hamad; Janet M Shaw
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Comparison of Reinforcement Techniques Using Suture on Staple-Line in Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Tomasz Rogula; Zhamak Khorgami; Martin Bazan; Cristina Mamolea; Pablo Acquafresca; Omar El-Shazly; Ali Aminian; Philip Schauer
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Evaluation of a modified circular stapler for use as a viscerotomy formation and closure device in natural orifice surgery.

Authors:  Danny A Sherwinter; Amar Gupta; Lee Cummings; Jeremy G Eckstein
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.