Literature DB >> 9854253

Single units and conscious vision.

N K Logothetis1.   

Abstract

Figures that can be seen in more than one way are invaluable tools for the study of the neural basis of visual awareness, because such stimuli permit the dissociation of the neural responses that underlie what we perceive at any given time from those forming the sensory representation of a visual pattern. To study the former type of responses, monkeys were subjected to binocular rivalry, and the response of neurons in a number of different visual areas was studied while the animals reported their alternating percepts by pulling levers. Perception-related modulations of neural activity were found to occur to different extents in different cortical visual areas. The cells that were affected by suppression were almost exclusively binocular, and their proportion was found to increase in the higher processing stages of the visual system. The strongest correlations between neural activity and perception were observed in the visual areas of the temporal lobe. A strikingly large number of neurons in the early visual areas remained active during the perceptual suppression of the stimulus, a finding suggesting that conscious visual perception might be mediated by only a subset of the cells exhibiting stimulus selective responses. These physiological findings, together with a number of recent psychophysical studies, offer a new explanation of the phenomenon of binocular rivalry. Indeed, rivalry has long been considered to be closely linked with binocular fusion and stereopsis, and the sequences of dominance and suppression have been viewed as the result of competition between the two monocular channels. The physiological data presented here are incompatible with this interpretation. Rather than reflecting interocular competition, the rivalry is most probably between the two different central neural representations generated by the dichoptically presented stimuli. The mechanisms of rivalry are probably the same as, or very similar to, those underlying multistable perception in general, and further physiological studies might reveal much about the neural mechanisms of our perceptual organization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9854253      PMCID: PMC1692419          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  121 in total

1.  ON THE SPREAD OF SUPPRESSION AND BINOCULAR RIVALRY.

Authors:  L KAUFMAN
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1963-12       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Effect of instructional conditions on rate of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  G M MEREDITH; C G MEREDITH
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1962-12

3.  A threshold difference produced by a figureground dichotomy.

Authors:  B WEITZMAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1963-08

4.  Personality, perceptual defense, and stereoscopic perception.

Authors:  J M DAVIS
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1959-05

5.  The rôle content in binocular resolution.

Authors:  E ENGEL
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1956-03

6.  The perceptual grouping criterion of colinearity is reflected by anisotropies of connections in the primary visual cortex.

Authors:  K E Schmidt; R Goebel; S Löwel; W Singer
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  How is a sensory map read Out? Effects of microstimulation in visual area MT on saccades and smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  J M Groh; R T Born; W T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Contrast dependence of contextual effects in primate visual cortex.

Authors:  J B Levitt; J S Lund
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Note on the distribution of dominance times in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  W J Levelt
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1967-05

10.  Dynamics of the pupil during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  S W Lowe; K N Ogle
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1966-03
View more
  74 in total

1.  Slow and fast visual motion channels have independent binocular-rivalry stages.

Authors:  W A van de Grind; P van Hof; M J van der Smagt; F A Verstraten
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  A spiking neuron model for binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Carlo R Laing; Carson C Chow
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  How context influences predominance during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Kenith V Sobel; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision.

Authors:  Hugh R Wilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Context-dependent perceptual modulation of single neurons in primate visual cortex.

Authors:  Alexander Maier; Nikos K Logothetis; David A Leopold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Strength of early visual adaptation depends on visual awareness.

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Duje Tadin; Kenith V Sobel; Tony A Raissian; Sang Chul Chong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Noise-induced alternations in an attractor network model of perceptual bistability.

Authors:  Rubén Moreno-Bote; John Rinzel; Nava Rubin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  Pre-semantically defined temporal windows for cognitive processing.

Authors:  Ernst Pöppel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Individual differences in the temporal dynamics of binocular rivalry and stimulus rivalry.

Authors:  Vaama Patel; Sjoerd Stuit; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-04

10.  Bi-stable depth ordering of superimposed moving gratings.

Authors:  Rubén Moreno-Bote; Asya Shpiro; John Rinzel; Nava Rubin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.