Literature DB >> 24246467

Neural substrates of perceptual integration during bistable object perception.

Anastasia V Flevaris1, Antigona Martínez, Steven A Hillyard.   

Abstract

The way we perceive an object depends both on feedforward, bottom-up processing of its physical stimulus properties and on top-down factors such as attention, context, expectation, and task relevance. Here we compared neural activity elicited by varying perceptions of the same physical image--a bistable moving image in which perception spontaneously alternates between dissociated fragments and a single, unified object. A time-frequency analysis of EEG changes associated with the perceptual switch from object to fragment and vice versa revealed a greater decrease in alpha (8-12 Hz) accompanying the switch to object percept than to fragment percept. Recordings of event-related potentials elicited by irrelevant probes superimposed on the moving image revealed an enhanced positivity between 184 and 212 ms when the probes were contained within the boundaries of the perceived unitary object. The topography of the positivity (P2) in this latency range elicited by probes during object perception was distinct from the topography elicited by probes during fragment perception, suggesting that the neural processing of probes differed as a function of perceptual state. Two source localization algorithms estimated the neural generator of this object-related difference to lie in the lateral occipital cortex, a region long associated with object perception. These data suggest that perceived objects attract attention, incorporate visual elements occurring within their boundaries into unified object representations, and enhance the visual processing of elements occurring within their boundaries. Importantly, the perceived object in this case emerged as a function of the fluctuating perceptual state of the viewer.

Keywords:  bistable perception; object attention; object perception

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24246467      PMCID: PMC3833463          DOI: 10.1167/13.13.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  146 in total

1.  Event-related desynchronization during anticipatory attention for an upcoming stimulus: a comparative EEG/MEG study.

Authors:  M C Bastiaansen; K B Böcker; C H Brunia; J C de Munck; H Spekreijse
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Brightness perception and filling-in.

Authors:  M A Paradiso; K Nakayama
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  When the brain changes its mind: interocular grouping during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  I Kovács; T V Papathomas; M Yang; A Fehér
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-12-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Bistable Gestalts reduce activity in the whole of V1, not just the retinotopically predicted parts.

Authors:  Lee H de-Wit; Jonas Kubilius; Johan Wagemans; Hans P Op de Beeck
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Perceptual alternations between unbound moving contours and bound shape motion engage a ventral/dorsal interplay.

Authors:  Anne Caclin; Anne-Lise Paradis; Cédric Lamirel; Bertrand Thirion; Eric Artiges; Jean-Baptiste Poline; Jean Lorenceau
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Attentional selection of relative SF mediates global versus local processing: evidence from EEG.

Authors:  Anastasia V Flevaris; Shlomo Bentin; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Binocular rivalry is not chaotic.

Authors:  S R Lehky
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1995-01-23       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Stimulus specificity of phase-locked and non-phase-locked 40 Hz visual responses in human.

Authors:  C Tallon-Baudry; O Bertrand; C Delpuech; J Pernier
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition.

Authors:  Christopher Summerfield; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Early processing in the human lateral occipital complex is highly responsive to illusory contours but not to salient regions.

Authors:  Marina Shpaner; Micah M Murray; John J Foxe
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 3.386

View more
  6 in total

1.  Dissociable Neural Information Dynamics of Perceptual Integration and Differentiation during Bistable Perception.

Authors:  Andrés Canales-Johnson; Alexander J Billig; Francisco Olivares; Andrés Gonzalez; María Del Carmen Garcia; Walter Silva; Esteban Vaucheret; Carlos Ciraolo; Ezequiel Mikulan; Agustín Ibanez; David Huepe; Valdas Noreika; Srivas Chennu; Tristan A Bekinschtein
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Attending to global versus local stimulus features modulates neural processing of low versus high spatial frequencies: an analysis with event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Anastasia V Flevaris; Antigona Martínez; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-04-09

3.  Beta, but not gamma, band oscillations index visual form-motion integration.

Authors:  Charles Aissani; Jacques Martinerie; Lydia Yahia-Cherif; Anne-Lise Paradis; Jean Lorenceau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The Temporal Dynamic Relationship Between Attention and Crowding: Electrophysiological Evidence From an Event-Related Potential Study.

Authors:  Chunhua Peng; Chunmei Hu; Youguo Chen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 5.  Bi-Stable Perception: Self-Coordinating Brain Regions to Make-Up the Mind.

Authors:  Christ Devia; Miguel Concha-Miranda; Eugenio Rodríguez
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Attention Determines Contextual Enhancement versus Suppression in Human Primary Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Anastasia V Flevaris; Scott O Murray
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 6.167

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.