Literature DB >> 7668667

Patient performance over eighteen months with the Ineraid intracochlear implant.

R F Gray1, S J Quinn, I Court, Z Vanat, D M Baguley.   

Abstract

We present our results with an 18-month follow-up for 15 adult patients treated with the Ineraid (formerly Symbion) four-channel intracochlear implant. All were postlingually deaf with profound or total hearing loss. Performance was tested in lipreading, implant only, and combined lipreading and implant modes using Boothroyd word lists, Bamford-Kowal-Bench (BKB) sentences, and Connected Discourse Tracking. Assessments were made after 10 hours of training and again at 9 and 18 months postimplantation. Mean scores at 18 months in the implant only mode were for Boothroyd word lists 39%, for BKB sentences 47%, and for connected discourse tracking 31 words per minute. In the combined implant and lipreading mode the mean scores were for Boothroyd word lists 85%, for BKB sentences 96%, and for connected discourse tracking 75 words per minute. A profile of implant performance against time shows that after 10 hours' training, 12 of the 15 subjects had some speech discrimination in the implant only mode for all three tests. When using their implant combined with lipreading, all 15 subjects improved their speech discrimination scores over those obtained with lipreading alone after 10 hours' training. By 9 months, all subjects had some speech discrimination in the implant only mode on all three tests. Between 9 and 18 months there was a slight trend toward improvement in implant performance, both when the implant was used alone and when it was combined with lipreading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7668667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl        ISSN: 0096-8056


  7 in total

1.  Maximizing cochlear implant patients' performance with advanced speech training procedures.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Amplitude fluctuations in a masker influence lexical segmentation in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Trevor T Perry; Bomjun J Kwon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Change in Speech Perception and Auditory Evoked Potentials over Time after Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Postlingually Deaf Adults.

Authors:  Suzanne C Purdy; Andrea S Kelly
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2016-02

4.  Experiments on Auditory-Visual Perception of Sentences by Users of Unilateral, Bimodal, and Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Julie Liss; Shuai Wang; Visar Berisha; Cimarron Ludwig; Sarah Cook Natale
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 5.  Speech Understanding in Complex Listening Environments by Listeners Fit With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Rene H Gifford
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  The process of spoken word recognition in the face of signal degradation.

Authors:  Ashley Farris-Trimble; Bob McMurray; Nicole Cigrand; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Computer-Assisted Speech Training for Cochlear Implant Patients: Feasibility, Outcomes, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2007-05-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.